A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Conversational Home Energy Management Systems

Abstract

The growing complexity in home energy management (HEM) demands advanced systems that guide occupants toward informed energy decisions reflecting their background, preferences, and context. Large language model (LLM)-integrated HEM systems (HEMS) have demonstrated promise, but previous studies relied on single-turn or single-task evaluations with response accuracy as the primary metric. Whether such systems deliver effective interactions across the extended multi-turn dialogues typical of real-world use remains an open question. This study introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework of LLM-integrated HEMS derived from the Goal-Question-Metric methodology, organized across five categories: task performance, factual accuracy, interaction quality, control capability, and system efficiency. A total of 23 metrics across multi-turn conversations are proposed and an LLM-as-judge pipeline is employed to enable scalable automated scoring. Its reliability is validated against three trained human coders: after iterative rubric calibration, twelve of the fifteen LLM-scored metrics reached strong agreement (ICC >= 0.73), three of them perfect, while the remaining three exhibited near-zero variance in human scores and are instead reported via mean absolute error (0.04-0.28). To demonstrate the framework's effectiveness, 970 dialogues -- 16 scenarios and five personas -- were generated and evaluated across four conversational HEMS configurations spanning a sophistication gradient, from a vanilla LLM with raw energy data to a multi-agent HEMS. The framework distinguished the four configurations across multiple evaluation dimensions, revealing their respective strengths and weaknesses. This study contributes to conversational HEMS by providing a reproducible, multi-dimensional evaluation methodology that comprehensively assesses sustained, context-aware system performance.