Skip to content
Open access

Plastome evolution and phylogenomic insights from representative taxa across all nine subfamilies of Malvaceae.

Jul 2026 · BMC Plant Biology · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

This study clarifies the major phylogenetic relationships within Malvaceae using a densely sampled plastome dataset and provides novel insights into the structural features and evolution of Malvaceae plastomes.

Abstract

Malvaceae Juss. comprises nine subfamilies and approximately 4,225 species, many of which are ecologically significant and several of which are cultivated for their high economic value. However, the backbone phylogeny of the family remains poorly resolved, and comprehensive structural variations across the entire family's plastomes are not comprehensively investigated. We newly sequenced 45 Malvaceae samples and integrated them with 85 plastomes from GenBank for phylogenetic analyses. After excluding two outgroups and four plastomes containing gaps, 124 Malvaceae plastomes were used for comparative structural analyses. The newly assembled plastomes exhibit a typical quadripartite structure, with length ranging from 158,346 to 163,741 bp and encoding 129-132 genes. We identified five distinct types of boundaries between inverted repeat regions (IRs) and single-copy (SC) regions. Furthermore, six coding genes (e.g., matK, ndhF) and 14 non-coding regions (e.g., trnH-psbA) were identified as highly variable, providing potential DNA markers for species delimitation. Analyses of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and long repeats revealed unique repeat patterns in Durio Adans., while codon usage bias analysis revealed a strong A/T preference across this family. Selection pressure analysis detected positive selection (dN/dS > 1) in the rpl23 gene, suggesting its potential role in adaptive evolution. Phylogenomic analyses reconstructed a highly supported backbone topology, resolving Malvaceae into two major clades: Byttneriina and Malvadendrina. Within Malvadendrina, Helicteroideae was the earliest-diverging lineage, and Tilioideae was strongly supported as sister to Dombeyoideae. Additionally, Hibiscus L. and Sida L. were confirmed to be non-monophyletic. This study clarifies the major phylogenetic relationships within Malvaceae using a densely sampled plastome dataset and provides novel insights into the structural features and evolution of Malvaceae plastomes.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Comparative plastome analysis and plastomic phylogeny of Moraceae with expanded species-level sampling.

Phylogenetic reconstruction based on complete plastome sequences strongly supported the monophyly of all seven recognized tribes of Moraceae, recovered the non-monophyly of Streblus, and placed Maclura within Chlorophoreae, consistent with recent nuclear and plastid phylogenomic frameworks.

Hui-Long Li, Wen Deng, Chen-Xuan Yang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Plastid genome evolution and phylogenomics with broad taxon sampling: insights into intrafamilial classification of Hamamelidaceae

The utility of plastid genome data for resolving deep-level phylogenetic relationships within Hamamelidaceae is highlighted, providing a robust framework for future taxonomic and evolutionary studies of this globally distributed and taxonomically complex family.

Sadaf Habib, Yong Shi, Jie Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Comparative plastome analysis and phylogenetic relationships of Chinese Myricaria species (Tamaricaceae)

Overall, Myricaria plastomes show a pattern of highly conserved genome structure coupled with localized sequence divergence, providing valuable resources for phylogenetic resolution, species identification, and plastome evolutionary studies.

Hai-Wen Li, Yiheng Wang, Yanlei Liu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Comparative genomics, phylogenomic reconstruction and divergence time analysis of 32 Delphinium species based on complete chloroplast genomes

Delphinium , characterized by distinctive spurred flowers, comprises numerous high-altitude endemic species with significant ornamental and medicinal value. However, the intrageneric phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of Delphinium have remained poorly resolved, primarily due to the limited variability of traditional DNA markers and complex morphological homoplasy. In this study, complete chloroplast genomes of three Delphinium spp. were sequenced and combined with those of 29 Delphinium spp. publicly available plastomes to conduct a comprehensive phylogenomic analysis and divergence time estimation. The Delphinium plastomes exhibited a highly conserved quadripartite structure, with genome sizes ranging from 153,769 to 157,339 bp. Comparative genomic analyses revealed 2,426 SSRs, and although narrow variable windows ( π > 0.02) were detected within or adjacent to five loci ( ndhA - ndhH , ycf2 , trnG - trnfM - rps14 , rrn23 , trnI ), their overall sequences remained highly conserved at the species level. Given their moderate overall divergence and reduced substitution saturation, these five loci are suitable for higher-level phylogeny, whereas conventional DNA barcodes and SSC-derived regions remain more effective for species-level discrimination. Phylogenomic reconstruction based on whole plastomes robustly supported the monophyly of Delphinium and resolved six well-supported primary clades, outperforming concatenated protein-coding genes in topological resolution. Furthermore, divergence time estimation revealed that the Delphinium crown group originated in the early Eocene (ca. 53.23 Ma; 95% HPD: 51.68-54.77 Ma). An initial major lineage divergence occurred during the Oligocene (ca. 28.53 Ma) driven by global cooling, followed by exPLoSive diversification during the Pliocene and Pleistocene (e.g., rapid radiation of core clades at 3.47 Ma). This recent rapid radiation was likely triggered by the intense uplift of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and recurrent Northern Hemisphere glaciations. Collectively, our study provides new insights into the plastome evolution and phylogeny of Delphinium , offering a robust evolutionary framework for understanding its diversification and facilitating future population genetic analyses.

Unknown authors · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.