Skip to content

From Noisy Traces to Root Causes: Structural Trajectory Analysis and Causal Extraction for Agent Optimization

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.07702 · 0 citations · 42 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

STRACE (Structural TRajectory Analysis and Causal Extraction) is a framework that constructs high signal-noise optimization contexts for more precise and effective optimization of long-horizon agents.

Abstract

The optimization of long-horizon agents increasingly relies on reflection-based mechanisms, where a large language model (LLM) acts as an optimizer to diagnose agent failures and improve agent policies. However, real execution traces are difficult to use directly for optimization: large trace collections are often redundant and heterogeneous, making optimization inefficient and prone to overfitting to low-value failures; meanwhile, each individual trajectory also contains many irrelevant steps, while naive context reduction methods such as truncation or sliding windows can discard causally important evidence and produce misleading optimization signals. To resolve this dilemma, we introduce STRACE (Structural TRajectory Analysis and Causal Extraction), a framework that constructs high signal-noise optimization contexts for more precise and effective optimization. At the batch level, STRACE mines failure patterns to filter redundant traces and retain representative failures; within each selected trace, it performs causal localization over a textual dependency graph to remove non-causal steps and identify the true root-cause module for optimization. Empirical results demonstrate that STRACE significantly outperforms standard context-filtering baselines. Notably, on a challenging formal verification task (VeruSAGE-Bench), it successfully optimizes human-expert designed agents, delivering $1.4\times$ success-rate improvement (42.5% to 58.5%). The code is available at https://github.com/moomight/STRACE .

View source

Similar papers

Jul 2026

Leveraging Trajectory Graphs for Pre-Execution Error Diagnosis in Agentic LLM Systems

This work proposes Trajectory Graph Copilot, a novel framework that acts as a ``copilot'' for LLM agents by diagnosing potential action errors before they are executed, significantly enhancing the agent's ability to complete long-horizon tasks successfully.

Xu Zheng, Zhuomin Chen, Chaohao Lin et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Repair or Resample? Rethinking Failure Debugging in LLM Multi-Agent Systems

This study introduces SymTrace, a controlled evaluation framework that records the MAS execution trajectory and establishes intervention anchors and explores the effectiveness of MAS repair methods, revealing that existing unguided rerun methods are highly unreliable.

Zhong-Wen Luan, Xiaoyan Zhang, Ming Hu et al. · 2 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Adaptive Influence Graphs for Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems

Adaptive Influence Graphs is introduced, a two-stage agentic framework that first transforms a failed trace into a structured graph and then navigates it to identify the critical error and establishes a new state of the art on Who&When, the standard benchmark for multi-agent failure attribution.

Yarden Bakish, Amir Dudai, Roy Ganz et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

TRAJDEBUG: Tracing Error Lifecycle to Identify Critical Failures in Long-Horizon Agent Trajectories

TrajDebug is proposed, an error-lifecycle tracing framework that addresses long-trajectory error discovery with multi-granularity history compression and evidence-based error identification, and supports critical attribution by tracing each error's resolution status and terminal impact.

Yunjia Qi, Zehua Yin, Xin Shi et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Diagnosing with Insights: Structured Analysis of Agent Failures via Behavioral Abstractions

With the proliferation of LLM agents, the ability to understand and diagnose failures in agents is essential to achieving superior effectiveness and trustworthiness. As agent failures often manifest via long and complex trajectories, manually finding the needles in the haystack is untenable. However, traditional diagnosis techniques for software bugs can hardly address LLM agent failures, while completely relying on LLMs as the judge yields unreliable diagnosis results. To overcome these challenges, this paper presents AGENTSCOPE, a new neuro-symbolic approach for agent failure mode diagnosis. The key principle of AGENTSCOPE is to abstract agent behavior, based on its trajectories, into structured representations. Furthermore, AGENTSCOPE introduces the concept of neural invariants to specify agent behavior properties. AGENTSCOPE leverages LLM-guided reasoning atop the structured representation against neural invariants to pinpoint both the failure step and its type in the trajectory. We show the effectiveness of AGENTSCOPE on publicly available agent failure datasets (Who&When) and a more comprehensive dataset created by us (AgentErrata), where AGENTSCOPE significantly outperforms the current state of the art in fault localization and attribution accuracy. Our work shows that integrating structured abstractions with LLM-guided reasoning enables effective, reliable, and interpretable diagnosis for agent failures.

Jia-Yi Bi, Yanjie Gao, Yuan-Min Xie et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.