A video-augmented VR framework that couples a physical ROS 2 autonomous robot vehicle to a Unity 6 application deployed on a Meta Quest 3S headset is presented, indicating that the framework can support temporally synchronized, semantically consistent, and accurate route-progress representation for immersive observation of physical autonomous-vehicle behavior.
Abstract
Autonomous vehicles are expected to improve road safety and efficiency, but passengers often remain uncertain about what the vehicle perceives and why it acts as it does. Virtual reality (VR) offers a safe and repeatable medium for presenting this information, yet most passenger-facing VR studies rely on fully simulated vehicles or pre-scripted scenarios, so the motion and perception shown to the user do not originate from a physically operating autonomous system. This paper presents a video-augmented VR framework that couples a physical ROS 2 autonomous robot vehicle to a Unity 6 application deployed on a Meta Quest 3S headset. The vehicle state and live onboard camera stream are transmitted over two independent communication channels, allowing the virtual vehicle to mirror the physical robot's motion while the passenger simultaneously views the vehicle's first-person camera feed and its navigation decisions through an in-vehicle dashboard interface. We evaluate the framework over 20 repeated closed-loop navigation trials. The system achieves a mean state-update latency of 29.63 ms, a mean relative route-progress error of 2.28% between the physical and virtual vehicles, and video delivery at 10.006 frames per second with 0.25% frame loss. All monitored navigation decisions were correctly reflected in the VR interface with no missed or incorrect notifications. The results indicate that the framework can support temporally synchronized, semantically consistent, and accurate route-progress representation for immersive observation of physical autonomous-vehicle behavior.
The advent of automated vehicles (AVs) prompted AutomotiveUI researchers to investigate how AVs can safely share the road with Human Road Users (HRUs). Researchers developed interfaces to facilitate AV-HRU interaction, e.g., on-vehicle eHMIs. However, these were mostly evaluated through online surveys with stationary p...
Ammar Al-Taie, Ming-Yu Han, Ian Oakley· Adjunct Proceedings of the 1...· 0 citations
This research used a VR approach (Meta Quest 3 Headset) to examine the efficiency of different types of symbols displayed by the eHMI of an AV to communicate its intentions to a VRU, and evaluated the effectiveness of the selected symbols.
Ru Li, Derrick G. Watson, Yan Liang et al.· 0 citations
We present V-DART (VR-based Dual-Arm Robot Teleoperation), an extended virtual reality framework for the teleoperation of mobile dual-arm robotic systems, building upon our previous work on stationary manipulator control. The enhanced system leverages Unreal Engine 5.6.1 (UE5) for real-time visualization and interactio...
Alejandro Torrejón, Jorge A. Calderón, P. Núñez et al.· Italian National Conference...· 0 citations
Future autonomous vehicle cabins may function as immersive spaces in which riders rest, work, or watch media while the vehicle manages navigation and control. Hazards create a communication challenge because riders may have little awareness about road conditions when the cabin needs to convey risk. We examine graceful...
Yu-Meng Ma, Rani Malhotra· Adjunct Proceedings of the 1...· 0 citations
This study compared three test environments — real traffic, an MRV setup, and a high-fidelity driving simulator — in evaluating a novel driver assistance system and demonstrated absolute validity in measuring cognitive load and acceptance (usefulness) of the system.
Chantal Himmels, Paula Santos, Kai-Feng Liu et al.· Proceedings of the 18th Inte...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.