We study prior-independent auction design when bidder values are independently and identically distributed and the seller knows only a scale-invariant shape restriction on their distribution, but neither the distribution nor the scale of values. We show that the maximin problem over a broad class of dominant-strategy incentive-compatible mechanisms reduces without loss to scale-free mechanisms. For any $n\ge 2$ monotone-hazard-rate bidders, the second-price auction without a reserve is maximin optimal over this class, including randomized mechanisms that may allocate to a lower bidder. We derive its exact guarantee for every $n$ and the sharp exponential rate at which its loss relative to the Bayesian optimum vanishes. Many familiar auctions are standard: they allocate only to a highest bidder, although incentive compatibility does not require this. For two regular bidders, we solve the standard problem exactly: its optimal mechanism mixes the second-price auction with a relative-markup auction and achieves a worst-case ratio of approximately $0.524413$. We construct a nonstandard mechanism that sometimes allocates to the lower bidder and achieves approximately $0.524829$, proving that standardness is strictly costly. The contrast is driven by tail restrictions: monotone hazard rate makes lower-rank allocation unhelpful, whereas regularity permits it to improve worst-case revenue.
Auto-bidding is now widely adopted in online advertising platforms, allowing advertisers to specify high-level campaign objectives--such as maximizing total value subject to a return-on-spend (ROS) constraint--rather than manual per-query bids. A central question in algorithmic mechanism design is characterizing the wo...
Yang Cai, Vineet Gupta, Yan-Chen Jiang et al.· 1 citation
The return-on-investment (ROI) constraint is central to many auctions, particularly in online advertising, where a bidder is unwilling to pay more than a fixed fraction of the value obtained. We study truthful and revenue-maximizing auctions for ROI-constrained bidders. We first characterize truthful auctions when both...
Zhiqiang Zhuang, Quan Yu, Yi-Song Wang et al.· 0 citations
We study revenue-maximizing multi-item auctions under dominant-strategy incentive compatibility (DSIC) and ex-post individual rationality. Buyers have additive valuations, and all item values are independent draws from a common finite distribution. For every two-point distribution and arbitrary numbers of buyers and it...
We study a discrete-time auction model in which multiple sellers update their bids according to their performance in the preceding round. Bidders aim to maximize their profits and adjust their bids solely based on their most recent outcome (myopic behavior). In each round, the auctioneer purchases the lowest-priced $p$...
Gioia Carinci, P. Ferrari, C. Franceschini et al.· 0 citations
We study the classical multi-item monopoly setting with a single additive buyer and $m$ heterogeneous items whose values are independent but not necessarily identically distributed. Optimal truthful auctions may be randomized and complicated. We analyze the approximation ratios of three simple deterministic auctions: s...