Sep 2026· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Abstract
An R package for statistics formed from a difference, ratio or residual of two quantities that share a measured component. Four such constructions are covered: a divergence measured against a shared reference arm, a trans term obtained by subtracting a cis term, a count of significant features read as an ordering of effect sizes, and an interaction contrast on compositional counts. The central analytical result is that when one noisy reference is used both as the regression predictor and as a component of the contrast, the naive estimator returns the true gain multiplied by the reliability of the reference arm. An apparent divergence is therefore produced even when the true divergence is exactly zero, and the direction of the inference inverts once the reliability falls below the reciprocal of the gain. The package quantifies this for a given design, applies an instrumental-variable correction where an instrument is available, and includes a known-truth simulator in which compositionality emerges from closed-sum sampling rather than being imposed. The test suite asserts the values the package can compute from its bundled tables, alongside each estimator's input-domain contract. The reliability, gain and mixture-test values of the accompanying paper are re-derived by lock scripts in its analysis deposit. This record archives version 0.1.3, a maintenance release of 0.1.2 that fixes edge cases listed in NEWS.md; it exports the same thirteen functions. The accompanying paper's reliability results were computed with version 0.1.2 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.22946335). Version 0.1.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.22693748) exports eleven functions and does not contain reliability_from_blocks() or reliability_from_replicates().
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.