Skip to content
#federated learning Open access

The Dual Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity: A Survey from Deepfake Attacks to Intelligent Defense

Sep 2026 · Science Discovery Artificial Intelligence · 16 references
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Abstract

The rapid iteration of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the cybersecurity offense-defense landscape. This paper systematically reviews research progress in this field from 2021 to 2026, focusing on the dual use of generative AI in cybersecurity. On the one hand, malicious actors exploit generative AI to create deepfake content, automate phishing emails, and conduct social engineering attacks, significantly improving the personalization and scalability of attacks. On the other hand, the same technological system demonstrates significant effectiveness in defense scenarios such as threat detection, vulnerability remediation, data augmentation, and security knowledge management. Existing reviews often treat attack and defense separately, lacking an integrated analytical framework. This paper analyzes the field from four dimensions: attack surface expansion, defense technology evolution, governance frameworks, and evaluation benchmarks. We first review generative AI-driven cyberattacks, covering deepfake attacks, automated phishing, automated malware development, and intelligent social engineering. We then examine defense applications, including intelligent threat detection, data augmentation and class imbalance handling, vulnerability detection and automated remediation, security knowledge management, and security education. Next, we identify key shortcomings in current research regarding adversarial robustness, privacy protection, interpretability, and deployment constraints. We further outline five future research directions: adaptive defense and adversarial robustness, federated learning and privacy protection, interpretability and human-machine collaboration, interdisciplinary governance frameworks, and multimodal security evaluation benchmarks. This review aims to provide a structured reference for building adaptive defense systems and interdisciplinary governance paths in the era of generative AI.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.