Skip to content
#federated learning Open access

Artificial Intelligence in Dementia with Lewy Bodies — Current Applications, Diagnostic Challenges, and Future Perspectives-Video

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder characterised by cognitive impairment together with variable combinations of cognitive fluctuations, recurrent visual hallucinations, rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder, parkinsonism, autonomic dysfunction, and other neurological and neuropsychiatric manifestations. Diagnostic uncertainty remains substantial because DLB overlaps clinically with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease dementia, vascular cognitive impairment, and other neurodegenerative disorders, while mixed neuropathology is common. Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine-learning and deep-learning approaches, offers an opportunity to integrate heterogeneous clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging, molecular, electrophysiological, and longitudinal data. Current research has investigated AI for differential diagnosis, neuroimaging analysis, multimodal biomarker integration, prodromal risk prediction, prognosis, and digital monitoring. More recently, multimodal biomarker studies in mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies have suggested that combinations of MRI, EEG, and plasma markers may provide additional prognostic information beyond cognitive testing alone. However, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence that AI is ready for autonomous clinical diagnosis. Explainable AI may improve transparency and facilitate clinical interpretation, but explanations themselves require validation and should not be regarded as evidence of causality. Future research should prioritise large multicentre longitudinal cohorts, biologically informed reference standards, multimodal and federated learning, calibrated probabilistic prediction, digital biomarkers, and prospective evaluation of clinical utility.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.