RealGUINoise: An Interactive Cross-Platform Benchmark for GUI Agent Robustness under Real-World Interface Noise
Yongjiang WuJunyuan ZhangAda ChenKuiyi GaoWenxuan Wang
Oct 2026
Human-computer Interaction
Abstract
Graphical User Interface (GUI) agents and Computer-Using Agents (CUAs) are rapidly becoming practical tools. However, real-world deployment increasingly exposes performance failures and safety risks, while a major yet underexplored source of these problems lies in the complex and noisy conditions of everyday interfaces. Existing benchmarks largely assume clean environments or focus narrowly on security-specific settings, and lack a unified framework for consistent, automated end-to-end evaluation across diverse agents and platforms. Hence, we introduce RealGUINoise, an interactive cross-platform, extensible benchmark for systematically evaluating GUI Agents under common realistic interface noise in fully interactive environments. Specifically, RealGUINoise comprises 42 noise types spanning web, desktop, and mobile tasks and integrates 7 representative agent frameworks. It evaluates these agents on real-world daily tasks through real-time interaction, comparing their performance against task-specific golden rubrics and clean-environment trajectories in terms of reliability, safety, and trajectory-level behavior. Our experiments show that these noises not only degrade task performance but also substantially redirect agents' action trajectories and increase their propensity for unsafe behavior. These findings expose a critical gap between capability in clean environments and dependable operation in real-world settings, establishing RealGUINoise as a testbed for developing more robust and trustworthy GUI agents.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 7, 2026
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.