Alexander G. AbanovLuca CandeloriHarold C. SteinackerMartin T. WellsJerome R. BusemeyerCameron J. HoganVahagn KirakosyanNicola MarzariSunil PinnamaneniDario VillaniMengjia XuKharen Musaelian
Sep 2026
Machine LearningQuantum ComputingData Science
Abstract
We demonstrate how Quantum Cognition Machine Learning (QCML) encodes data as quantum geometry. In QCML, features of the data are represented by learned Hermitian matrices, and data points are mapped to states in Hilbert space. The quantum geometry description endows the dataset with rich geometric and topological structure---including intrinsic dimension, quantum metric, and Berry curvature---derived directly from the data. QCML captures global properties of data, while avoiding the curse of dimensionality inherent in local methods. The present work provides the first full exposition of QCML as a framework for \emph{matrix geometry}, establishing its mathematical foundation and demonstrating how operator-level tools from quantum geometry can be directly applied to data. We introduce the matrix Laplacian and its eigenmaps as a geometry-preserving alternative to graph-based embeddings, and we show how topological invariants such as Chern numbers can be extracted from data for the first time. An important practical outcome is the efficiency of the representation: high-dimensional datasets can be faithfully modeled with Hilbert spaces of size as small as $N \sim 10$, revealing global structures that are hard to capture with linear methods such as PCA. We illustrate these results on a number of synthetic and real-world examples, including the Wisconsin Breast Cancer dataset, where QCML uncovers geometric separability between benign and malignant samples and yields an interpretable decomposition of feature relevance. The emphasis of this work is on a new geometric representation of data rather than on algorithmic benchmarking, establishing a foundation for extracting global geometric and topological structure from high-dimensional datasets.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.
Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 316 citations· ⚡15
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 2, 2026