Skip to content
Review Open access

Towards Reliable Research: Development and Medical Verification of a Health Claims Corpus

Sep 2026 · Linguistics and Intercultural Communication · 0 citations · 14 references

TL;DR

The study demonstrates that reliable medical data annotation requires expert-driven, multi-layered validation with mandatory source verification with mandatory source verification, emphasizing that linguistic precision is as crucial as factual accuracy.

Abstract

The proliferation of digital information has fundamentally changed health-seeking behavior, with individuals increasingly turning to the internet for medical advice. This trend, evidenced by millions of search queries on Runet, is complicated by highly variable reliability of online health information. While Natural Language Processing (NLP) offers promising solutions for automated credibility assessment, its development is hindered by the scarcity of high-quality, expertly annotated datasets. Existing resources often lack in medical verification, being labeled through crowdsourcing or by non-specialists, which severely limits their practical utility. This paper presents a novel Russian-language dataset of health claims and details its meticulous development methodology. The dataset construction followed three core principles: representativeness (reflecting actual Runet discourse), balance (across truthfulness and valence), and verifiability (against authoritative sources). A significant innovation is the inclusion of a “Disputed” category for claims involving partial truths, exaggerations, or insufficient evidence. A multi-stage verification pipeline involved linguistic screening by philologists, independent assessment by six physicians (Fleiss’ κ = 0.316), and source-backed annotation by medical experts (κ = 0.383). A journalist refined formulations for accessibility, while a meta-reviewer resolved discrepancies based on argument persuasiveness. The final dataset contains 108 claims (40 True, 40 False, 28 Disputed) across five themes: Vaccination, GMOs, Lifestyle, Alternative Medicine, and Vitamins. Beyond medical NLP applications, this resource will be used/employed in few-shot learning, psycholinguistics, and AI verification strategies. The study demonstrates that reliable medical data annotation requires expert-driven, multi-layered validation with mandatory source verification, emphasizing that linguistic precision is as crucial as factual accuracy. Thus, the developed dataset makes a valuable contribution to both computational linguistics and digital healthcare research, providing a robust benchmark for future studies in Russian-language medical text processing.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

An Evidence-Guided Reasoning Framework for Explainable Chinese Health Misinformation Detection

EGER-LLM is developed, an integrated framework for evidence-guided reasoning that combines heterogeneous evidence organization, evidence-conditioned LLM adaptation, uncertainty-aware decision-boundary refinement, and evidence-grounded explanation generation within a unified workflow that enables more reliable and expla...

Yuan Liu, Gui-Qiong Xu · 0 citations

EviGen: Predictive Evidence Scaffolding for Verifiable Clinical Rationale Generation

Longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs) capture years of patient history across notes, codes, labs, and procedures, and contain evidence needed to reason about likely clinical outcomes. However, comprehensive clinician review of these records is impractical, and LLM-based processing is costly and often unreliable...

Feng-Nan Li, Heman Burre, Li-Wen Sun et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence and Health Misinformation in Healthcare: Opportunities, Limitations and Future Directions.

The rapid digitalisation of health information has transformed how individuals access medical knowledge but has also facilitated the widespread dissemination of health misinformation. The World Health Organization describes this phenomenon as an infodemic, characterised by an overabundance of information that includes...

Hasan H. Alsararatee, Ahmad Abu Allam · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Building Trustworthy Mental Health Benchmarks on Bluesky: A Validation-Aware Weak-Supervision Framework

These findings show that decentralized social media can support reproducible mental health benchmarking, but only when system design, label provenance, validation strategy, and deployment constraints are evaluated together.

Gaurab Chhetri, Anandi K. Dutta, Subasish Das · 0 citations
Conference Open access 2026

Application and Analysis of AI Large Models in Health Science Popularization Q&A and Medical Image Interpretation

This paper organizes the task lineage, method paradigms, and evaluation points along two lines: "Multimodal medical image analysis-Text-based health science popularization questions - Safety, ethics, and compliance governance" and "Multimodal medical image analysis-Text-based health science popularization questions - S...

Kai-Ye Zhou · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

A Living Benchmark for Information Retrieval from Electronic Health Records

A scalable framework that automatically generates question--answer pairs from longitudinal EHR notes that supports evaluations that static benchmarks cannot, including the generation of multiple answers that reflect variation in clinician reasoning for robust performance assessment and continuously refreshing benchmark...

J. Cahoon, C. Stanwyck, Sulaiman Somani et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.