Skip to content
Review

Detecting and correcting Factual Error in LLM Text series: Review

Jul 2026 · International Scientific Journal of Engineering and Management · Vol 05, pp. 1-7 · 0 citations

TL;DR

This thesis begins by establishing the background and motivation for the study, focusing on the growing importance of automatic text summarization and the challenges associated with factual inconsistencies in generated summaries, and critically reviews prior research in the field of text summarization.

Abstract

This thesis presents a detailed introduction to the research work. It begins by establishing the background and motivation for the study, focusing on the growing importance of automatic text summarization and the challenges associated with factual inconsistencies in generated summaries. The chapter critically reviews prior research in the field of text summarization, highlighting the limitations of traditional Automatic Text Summarization (ATS) systems, particularly in ensuring factual correctness. Furthermore, the chapter introduces Large Language Models (LLMs) and prompt engineering as emerging solutions capable of addressing these limitations. The objectives of the research, along with the key research questions, are clearly articulated to define the scope and direction of the study. The chapter also delineates the boundaries of the research by specifying the scope and assumptions considered. Finally, the significance of the study is discussed, emphasizing its contribution to improving evaluation methodologies for text summarization systems. . Key Words: Natural Language Processing (NLP), Large Language Models (LLM), Chain of Thought (COT), Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT), Recall-Oriented Understudy

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

A Reassessment of TextRank: Graph-Based Extractive Summarization in the Era of Large Language Models- A Systematic Review

This survey presents a systematic review of 121 references spanning 2002 to 2026, tracing the evolution of TextRank-based approaches into hybrid LLM pipelines and advancing three qualified arguments.

Ahmed J. Jabur, Asmaa Abdul Azeez Dakhil, Israa Saad Mohammed et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

A Human-in-the-Loop Corpus for LLM-Based Simplification of Scientific Summaries

This work study large language model (LLM)-based simplification of scientific texts and presents a human-in-the-loop workflow that transforms expert summaries into more accessible versions for non-specialists.

Kyuri Im, Michael Färber · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Reexamining zero-shot summarization: Empirical investigation of trustworthiness of LLM-summarizers

This study proposes a novel two-level diagnostic protocol for benchmarking LLM-summarizers based on the stability of the generated summaries and motivates further research towards development of robust, reliable and trustworthy LLM-summarizers.

Vasudha Bhatnagar, Purnima Bindal, Vikas Kumar et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Automated Summarization Tool

The design realization and evaluation of an Automated Summarization Tool (AST) is presented which is a document intelligence platform based on google gemini 2.5 flash that outperforms the strongest fine-tuned transformer baselines (PEGASUS, BART) by ~14 points and is clearly ahead of BERTSUM-ext (a strong transformer baseline), Pointer-Generator Network, TextRank.

K. Kumar, A. Amandeep, Dharmender Kumar et al. · 0 citations
Review

Suggested format/template for extended abstract

The study resulted in the development of a novel six-component framework comprising Input Processing, LLM Core, Knowledge Enhancement, Context Management, Response Generation, Response Generation, and Human Feedback that successfully addressed resource scarcity through language detection and cross-lingual query understanding.

Unknown authors · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.