Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

A remote sensing image processing method based on edge computing and deep learning

Sep 2026 · Discover Internet of Things · Vol 6 · 34 references

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and edge computing has increased the demand for accurate and low-latency remote sensing image classification; however, conventional cloud-centric approaches face challenges related to processing latency, communication overhead, and efficient analysis of diverse land-cover scenes. This research proposes a remote sensing image processing method based on edge computing and deep learning (DL), integrating an Adaptive Chameleon Swarm-tuned Efficient Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (ACS-E3DCNN). The Remote Sensing Image Dataset obtained from Kaggle contains 5,631 RGB images categorized into five land-cover classes, namely agriculture, barren land, urban, vegetation, and water. During preprocessing, image normalization, adaptive histogram equalization, and non-local means filtering are applied to reduce noise, enhance contrast, and improve image quality. Subsequently, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is employed for dimensionality refinement. The Efficient Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network captures discriminative image representations with reduced parameter complexity, while the Adaptive Chameleon Swarm algorithm optimizes critical hyperparameters, including learning rate, kernel depth, and filter dimensions, to improve convergence and classification performance. Experimental results implemented using Python 3.10.1 demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms existing approaches, achieving an accuracy of 98.10%, F1-score of 96.85%, PSNR of 38.05, SSIM of 0.97, and latency of 85 ms under the 80:20 data split, with a statistically significant paired t-test result ( p < 0.05). The proposed model provides an intelligent, reliable, and efficient approach for remote sensing image classification, supporting accurate land-cover mapping, environmental monitoring, and low-latency edge-enabled image processing.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.