Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

Space–Air–Ground Integrated Networks for Smart Agriculture and Smart Breeding: A Review of SDN/NFV-Enabled Intelligent Resource Management

Sep 2026 · Sensors
UAV Applications and Optimization

Abstract

Smart agriculture and smart breeding are evolving from isolated sensing toward geographically distributed, long-term, data-driven closed-loop management. Dispersed farms and breeding sites, UAV and remote-sensing phenotyping, real-time field control, edge inference, and digital-twin synchronization impose heterogeneous demands on coverage, latency, bandwidth, reliability, computing, and energy. Space–air–ground integrated networks (SAGINs) combine satellites, unmanned aerial vehicles/high-altitude platforms, and terrestrial networks for wide-area coverage and elastic access, but introduce dynamic topologies, heterogeneous multi-domain resources, and complex cross-layer orchestration. Focusing on intelligent SAGIN resource management enabled by software-defined networking (SDN) and network function virtualization (NFV), this review examines controller placement, NFV/service function chain orchestration, SDN/NFV cooperation, learning-driven optimization, and security mechanisms. Representative studies are compared by objectives, decision variables, mechanisms, applicability boundaries, and engineering costs. These mechanisms are connected to smart agriculture and smart breeding through ubiquitous connectivity, edge computing, task offloading, phenotyping, and digital-twin closed loops, while distinguishing experimentally supported agricultural evidence from SAGIN-oriented architectural inference. Future research should move beyond single-metric optimization toward joint evaluation of state freshness, decision latency, reconfiguration cost, learning and security overhead, and agronomic outcomes to improve deployability, robustness, and verifiability of cross-domain resource management under real deployment conditions across heterogeneous agricultural environments.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.