Jun 2025· ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems· 23 citations· ⚡ 2 influential· 132 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
A systematic literature review of 63 papers on artistic co-creative systems that clarifies what current co-creative systems actually do, how they support creativity, and qualitative experiences of what users value or struggle with when working with them is created.
Abstract
The co-creativity community is forging ahead with building more sophisticated and tailored systems to support and enhance human creativity. Design considerations or learnings from previous work can be an important and efficient starting point for this. To assist with that, we created a systematic literature review of 63 papers on artistic co-creative systems that clarifies what current co-creative systems actually do, how they support creativity, and qualitative experiences of what users value or struggle with when working with them. The contribution of the paper also includes a set of 15 actionable design considerations that link system design choices to their impact on creativity and user experience. The selected papers span a diverse range of artistic applications, from visual arts to design, writing, etc, where the AI's role goes beyond that of a tool- to engaging with the creative process or the user as an active collaborator. From the literature surveyed, we identified several dimensions of relevance to the design of such systems- (1) Phase of the creative process, (2) Creative task, (3) Proactive behaviour of the system, (4) User control, (5) System embodiment, (6) AI Model type. We see repeated tendencies across systems, such as users responding differently to the same behaviour depending on how the system's role is framed, and shared initiative leading to higher satisfaction and smoother collaboration when the balance is slightly tipped toward the human; these are simply two examples among many patterns identified across the six dimensions, of which only a small subset can be included in the abstract. Despite advancements, key limitations persist, including a lack of systems addressing early creative phases like problem clarification, and the complexity of user adaptation to AI tools.
Abstract The increasing importance of co-creative tools in creative graphic design tasks has made it essential to understand how different levels of expertise shape the collaborative process between humans and computers. This paper presents a study with 30 participants to explore the impact of the PatternPursuit on the...
Joana Rovira Martins, Pedro Martins, A. Boavida· Design Science· 0 citations
AI-supported design tools have become increasingly influential in creative production processes in visual communication design. This change affects production speed, the definition of creativity, the designer’s position within the process, and questions of originality and ownership. This study examines how visual commu...
Ekin Bahar Kaya· Ekev Akademi Dergisi· 0 citations
In this pictorial, we consider how the negotiation of creative boundaries with a co-creative AI system can create moments for personal creative reflection. We ground this in our experiences with Froggi-Draw, a single-initiative co-doodling system that gives users power to decide when and how much an AI"collaborator"(Fr...
Samia Menon, Samyukta Jayaram, Chetan Goenka et al.· 0 citations
Generative AI (GenAI) applications are increasingly adopted in co-creative workflows, taking an active role in design and development tasks. GenAI offers unique opportunities through content generation and synthesis across resources, yet it can lead to losses in co-creativity, due to limited collaborative interactions...
Yvonne A. Farah, Michael C. Dorneich· Proceedings of the Human Fac...· 0 citations
The preliminary findings suggest that experiencing AI as a collaborative partner is not necessarily in tension with feeling like the author of the work, and highlight the importance of studying alternative non-conversational interface paradigms that help integrate AI into a human-led creative process.
Eugénie Desmedt, Dominik Arnstorfer, Martina Mara· Adjunct Proceedings of the 1...· 0 citations
This study investigates AI driven visual artistic production in Türkiye as a socio technical system, examining the interplay among human artists, AI technologies, institutional frameworks, and cultural contexts. A qualitative case study approach was employed with twelve professional visual artists purposefully sampled....
Oğuz Yurttadur· Selcuk Universitesi Sosyal B...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.