Aug 2026· Pertanika Journal of Vocational, Science and Technology Education· Vol 2, pp. 16· 0 citations· 19 references
Abstract
The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has positioned AI literacy as an important competency across disciplines. This exploratory cross-sectional study examined whether AI literacy differed across three disciplinary groups at Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) and whether self-directed learning readiness (SDLR) was associated with AI literacy and could help explain faculty-level differences. A total of 312 students from the Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Faculty of Educational Studies, and Faculty of Forestry and Environment participated through non-probability quota/purposive recruitment. One-way ANOVA and regression analyses showed significant faculty differences in AI literacy, whereas SDLR did not differ significantly across faculties. SDLR was positively associated with AI literacy and explained 13.4% of its variance. The available results did not provide evidence that SDLR accounted for the observed faculty differences; this mediation interpretation is treated cautiously because the archived analysis output did not contain the indirect-effect bootstrap estimate and confidence interval. The findings therefore establish associations between faculty membership, SDLR, and AI literacy rather than causal or structural mechanisms. They support further research on curriculum exposure, access to AI resources, prior training, and instructional practices across disciplinary contexts.
It is argued that institutional readiness—defined by equitable access, policy clarity, and tiered professional development—is more determinative of successful integration than technological sophistication.
Sultan Saleh Ahmed Almekhlafy, Mohammad Saeed Al-Ahmari· International Journal of Inf...· 0 citations
This study aims to determine university students’ levels of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy and to examine the patterns of variation of this competence across individual and educational variables. Conducted within the Turkish higher education context, where empirical evidence on AI literacy remains limited, this...
Okan Dede· Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buc...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is now embedded in many university learning activities, where it can support personalised study, academic assistance, rapid feedback, and greater student autonomy. These opportunities, however, may be accompanied by psychological strain when learners do not have the knowledge, evaluative ju...
Kadek Dwi Hendratma Gunawan, Budi Utami, Suciati Suciati et al.· International Conferences on...· 0 citations
The findings suggest that the quantity of AI use and learners’ competency to understand, evaluate, and self-regulate AI use are empirically distinct indicators that universities should measure separately.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping educational practices and redefining how academic writing is taught, learned, and assessed. This study explores the role of a structured AI-supported writing intervention on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students’ academic writing performance and examines lecturers’ aware...
Joaquim Vicente Vinte, Mustafa Kurt· Discover Computing· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in higher education, reshaping how students learn, evaluate information, and prepare for professional practice. Despite this rapid integration, AI literacy remains uneven across disciplines, particularly in non-technical fields such as psychology. This quantitative...
Zaine Zulkifli, Muhammad Redza Mohd Radzi, Siti Atiyah Ali et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.