Aug 2026· Nursing Reports· Vol 16· 0 citations· 32 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Nursing curricula may benefit from structured AI education that integrates guided GenAI practice, case-based learning, and faculty feedback that integrates guided GenAI practice, case-based learning, and faculty feedback.
Abstract
Background: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly integrated into nursing education, yet structured AI literacy training and ethical guidance remain limited. Consequently, nursing students often rely on informal learning, resulting in variability in AI readiness, confidence, and responsible use. Aims: This study was conducted to examine (1) whether AI literacy was positively associated with AI self-efficacy and AI attitudes and (2) whether AI self-efficacy mediated the relationship between AI literacy and AI attitudes. Methods: A cross-sectional survey using convenience sampling was conducted with 100 prelicensure nursing students in New York City. Data were collected using the AI Literacy Scale (AILS), AI Self-Efficacy Scale (AISES), and Generative AI Attitude Scale (GAIAS). Correlation and path analyses were performed using SPSS and Amos 30.0. Results: The participants had a mean age of 30.25 years, and 71% were women. AI literacy and AI self-efficacy were both positively associated with AI attitudes (all p < 0.001). Path analysis showed that AI literacy significantly predicted AI self-efficacy (β = 0.39, p < 0.001) and AI attitudes (β = 0.28, p = 0.003). AI self-efficacy significantly predicted AI attitudes (β = 0.31, p = 0.001) and partially mediated the relationship between AI literacy and AI attitudes. Conclusions: AI self-efficacy partially mediated the relationship between AI literacy and AI attitudes. Nursing curricula may benefit from structured AI education that integrates guided GenAI practice, case-based learning, and faculty feedback. Such educational frameworks warrant further empirical investigation regarding their potential to foster AI literacy, AI self-efficacy, and positive attitudes toward responsible AI integration, particularly through longitudinal studies assessing subsequent behavioral outcomes.
Higher AI literacy was associated with lower AI anxiety, and this association was partly accounted for by AI attitudes and AI self-efficacy in the proposed serial mediation model, which suggests that more favorable attitudes may be linked to stronger self-efficacy, which may be related to lower anxiety.
Qin Zeng, Shenghua Zhang, Jiachen Hu et al.· Frontiers in Public Health· 0 citations
The findings indicate that nursing students had generally positive levels of AI literacy and attitudes toward AI, and higher AI literacy was associated with more positive attitudes toward AI.
M. Çil, Berna Eren Fidancı, D. Yildiz· Journal of Education and Res...· 0 citations
Nursing students’ AI technology attitudes and AI ethics awareness were positively associated with AI utilization, whereas AI ethics mediated between AI technology attitudes and AI utilization.
D. J. Berdida, Noura Alhudaib, R. A. N. Grande et al.· Journal of Nursing Managemen...· 0 citations
The findings highlight the need for a supportive educational environment with guidance to enable nursing students to use artificial intelligence appropriately and responsibly when needed, particularly among vocational college students and those from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds.
Hui-Ying Fan, Qing Zhou, Lili Deng et al.· BMC Nursing· 0 citations
It is indicated that both self-directed learning and AI acceptance are associated with perceived clinical competence, with AI acceptance acting as a mediating factor.
Boshra Karem Mohamed El-Sayed, Ayman Ateq Alamri, M. G. R. Asal et al.· BMC Medical Education· 0 citations
Abstract Background AI is increasingly being integrated into education and health care, offering opportunities to improve learning, understanding of clinical cases, and students’ self-confidence. However, it remains necessary to assess nursing students’ perceptions of AI and its impact on their academic and professional development. Objective The aim of the study was to assess AI use among nursing students, their perceptions of AI, and its impact on learning, academic performance, and professional preparation. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study with analytical components was conducted at the Faculty of Medical Technical Sciences in Elbasan, Albania. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire administered via Google Forms, which assessed AI use and its perceived impact on learning and professional preparation. Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 23.0). Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests for associations between variables (P<.05), and logistic regression to estimate crude odds ratios (CORs) and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% CIs were used. Results A total of 279 nursing students participated in the study (mean age 22.4, SD 5.7 years), the majority of whom were female (273/279, 97.8%), lived in urban areas (156/279, 55.9%), and were enrolled in the bachelor’s program (198/279, 71%). Overall, 83.9% (234/279) reported using AI, mainly virtual assistants such as ChatGPT or similar tools (183/234, 78.2%). The most common reason was information searching (216/234, 92.3%), followed by studying and understanding lecture content (96/234, 41%). Bivariate analysis showed no significant associations between AI use and residence or study cycle, whereas grade point average (GPA) was significantly associated with AI use. In the multivariable analysis, GPA remained the only independent predictor of AI use. Students with a GPA of 6.0 to 6.9 (AOR 5.55, 95% CI 1.53-20.14; P=.009) and those with a GPA of 8.0 to 8.9 (AOR 5.73, 95% CI 1.26-26.00; P=.02) were significantly more likely to use AI than the reference group. Students perceived AI as having a moderate impact on learning, particularly understanding lectures (mean 2.58, SD 1.10) and exam preparation (mean 2.58, SD 1.02), whereas its impact on self-confidence (mean 1.97, SD 1.17) and empathy (mean 1.90, SD 1.12) was perceived as low. Although AI was considered useful for supporting learning (mean 2.83, SD 1.12), students expressed concerns regarding the reliability of AI-generated information (mean 3.18, SD 1.22), dependence on AI (mean 2.75, SD 1.28), and its impact on critical thinking (mean 2.80, SD 1.18). Conclusions AI is widely used among nursing students, primarily supporting learning and academic performance. However, its impact on professional and interpersonal competencies remains limited. These findings suggest the need for integrating AI into nursing education curricula, with a focus on critical use and the development of students’ professional competencies.