Jul 2026· Engineering & Technology· pp. 313-327· 0 citations
TL;DR
This chapter emphasises the advantages of quantum technology in drug discovery: enhanced accuracy in molecular simulations, Accelerated drug screening, better comprehension of reactions, and Tailored medicine.
Abstract
Materials science has historically depended on a blend of experimental methods and theoretical modelling to identify and create new materials with specific properties. Nevertheless, these processes may require considerable time and resources, and are frequently constrained by the intricacy of material systems. The rise of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning, has revolutionised materials science by offering powerful tools that accelerate the discovery, design, and characterisation of novel materials. This chapter emphasises the latest developments in AI applications in materials science for drug discovery. Artificial Intelligence is proficient at analysing intricate data, enhancing processes, and developing drug candidates, whereas quantum systems enable unparalleled molecular simulations, highly sensitive sensing, and accurate physical control. Applications in drug discovery are emphasised, encompassing molecular property prediction and molecular generation. This chapter focuses on technologies such as Nanomaterials, Biomaterials, Polymers, Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs), Hydrogels, and Smart Materials. This chapter emphasises the advantages of quantum technology in drug discovery: enhanced accuracy in molecular simulations, Accelerated drug screening, better comprehension of reactions, and Tailored medicine. Additionally, the challenges include: hardware limitations, the high cost of error correction, the maturity of algorithms, integration with classical methods, and issues related to cost and accessibility.
Early-stage decisions in the pharmaceutical development process carry outsized consequences for eventual clinical success, yet the computational tools underpinning these decisions remain fundamentally constrained. Computer-aided drug design (CADD) has transformed how researchers navigate chemical space and predict ligand–target interactions, but classical implementations rely on mechanical force-field approximations that fail to capture polarisation, charge transfer, and electron correlation effects central to molecular recognition and reactivity. Quantum-mechanical treatments that correctly describe these phenomena scale exponentially with system size on classical hardware, rendering them impractical for drug-relevant biomolecules. Quantum computing offers a physically motivated path beyond this scaling barrier: by exploiting superposition, entanglement, and interference, quantum algorithms can in principle simulate electronic structure with polynomial resource requirements for targeted problem classes. This article provides a theoretical review of how quantum computation integrates throughout the drug discovery pipeline, from target identification to lead optimisation. Its primary contribution is a pipeline-level mapping of quantum methods—including the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), quantum machine learning, and quantum-enhanced optimisation—to specific drug development stages. The review critically distinguishes near-term NISQ (Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum: current devices with 50–1,000 noisy qubits operating without full error correction) capabilities from fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) requirements, quantifies current resource gaps through a worked CYP3A4 case study, and identifies algorithmic limitations (barren plateaus, ansatz expressibility, measurement overhead), hardware scalability, and error correction overhead as the principal barriers to practical deployment.
Unknown authors· Frontiers in Drug Discovery· 0 citations
This chapter presents the perspective of computational chemists at Sygnature Discovery on the growing need to integrate quantum mechanics (QM) with artificial intelligence (AI) to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of modern drug design.
Alexander Heifetz, Girinath G. Pillai, M. Quareshy et al.· Methods in molecular biology· 0 citations
This review emphasizes the influence of new AI platforms like AlphaFold3, molecular interactions are structurally optimized (MISATO), and ZairaChem on the discovery of oncology drugs and examines how AI reconciles chemical design with pharmacological feasibility.
Mohsin Ali, Muhammad Ali Tajwar, Farid Ahmed et al.· Medicinal research reviews (...· 0 citations
It is essential to view AI technologies as an instrumental but supplementary part of decision-making in pharmaceutical research and development rather than a fully independent alternative to traditional hit- and lead-discovery strategies.
Saikat Biswas, Somenath Bhattacharya, Soumallya Chakraborty· International Journal for Re...· 0 citations
The traditional drug discovery and development process is historically characterized by high attrition rates, escalating financial costs, and decade-long timelines. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has transformed this paradigm by enabling efficient navigation through vast chemical spaces and the integration of complex multi-omic datasets. This evidence-based literature review critically examines the evolution and application of computational technologies across the pharmaceutical pipeline, ranging from early expert systems like DENDRAL, computer-aided drug design (CADD), and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling to AlphaFold 3 biomolecular complex predictions, computer-assisted synthesis planning (CASP), natural product bioprospecting, and autonomous multi-agent systems. Key advancements in antimicrobial screening, precision oncology, phytochemical characterization, and clinical-stage AI-generated molecules are highlighted. Finally, the translational gap is addressed, emphasizing that AI functions as an advanced decision-support framework requiring rigorous in vitro and in vivo experimental validation, wherein qualified human mediation remains indispensable for therapeutic success.
Leonardo Mairene Muniz· Brazilian Journal of Health...· 0 citations