Sep 2026· European Journal of General Dentistry· 25 references
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Abstract
Abstract Removable partial dentures (RPDs) held in place by clasps have become a favored option for treating patients with partial tooth loss. However, these dentures have their drawbacks, including the issue of frequent displacement, which can lead to patient dissatisfaction and decreased usage, especially in situations involving the back of the lower jaw. The study aimed to examine the stress distribution pattern in implant-assisted RPDs (IARPDs). A computed tomographic scan of data from an edentulous patient was used to simulate a finite element three-dimensional (3D) model of the edentulous mandible. Using 3D modeling software (solid edge software, Siemens PLM software, United States), threaded implants and abutments were duplicated, and a framework was created. A 200 N axial and nonaxial stress was applied unilaterally and bilaterally. Higher stress concentrations were observed under unilateral loading compared with bilateral loading for all attachment systems. Under bilateral loading, locator attachments demonstrated the lowest implant stress (8.00 MPa) and reduced stress transfer to the surrounding bone. Under unilateral loading, healing caps exhibited the lowest implant stress (23.8 MPa), whereas ball attachments generated the highest stress values (44.4 MPa). Bilateral ball attachments showed the lowest framework stress (5.91 MPa) and prosthesis deformation (0.018 mm). Bilateral implant-assisted configurations demonstrated more favorable stress distribution than unilateral loading conditions. Locator attachments were most effective in minimizing stress transfer to the implant and surrounding bone under bilateral loading. In unilateral scenarios, ball attachments exhibited comparatively lower stress concentrations. These findings may assist clinicians in selecting appropriate attachment systems; however, clinical validation is required before definitive recommendations can be made.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.