Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

Exact localization of Grover quantum walks on crystal lattices: transfer currents, a universal bound, and uniform-spanning-tree degree laws

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Abstract

Exact results for the localization ("trapping") of discrete-time Grover quantum walks on crystal lattices. A finite fraction of a Grover walker stays at its starting point forever, because the walk operator has flat eigenvalues. This paper computes the long-time return probability p̄ exactly for many lattices. Main results:• For the flip-flop Grover walk, the +1 and −1 flat-band projectors are I − Y and I − Y^Q, where Y and Y^Q are the Kirchhoff transfer-current matrices of the Laplacian and signless Laplacian. This reduces trapping to lattice Green functions. It gives closed forms in terms of Watson integrals (simple cubic, BCC, FCC), complete elliptic integrals (triangular, kagome, checkerboard, star, line graphs) and elementary functions of the bond anisotropy.• A universal lower bound p̄ ≥ (d−2)² / [2d(d−1)] for edge-transitive lattices of vertex degree d, attained exactly on the honeycomb, diamond and Laves graph lattices.• Exact trapping for lazy (Szegedy) walks on the square, triangular, honeycomb and diamond lattices as functions of the laziness.• For the moving-shift walk on Z^d, trapping is governed by A_d = ∫₀^∞ erfc(√s)^d ds, with elementary closed forms for d ≤ 5.• The degree of a vertex in the uniform spanning tree is exactly 1 + Binomial(z−1, 1/(z−1)) on 2-arc-transitive lattices, with closed-form degree distributions for several other lattices. All closed forms were identified by integer-relation (PSLQ) searches at 25–80 digits and checked by Brillouin-zone diagonalization and direct simulation of the walks. AI-use disclosure: this research, including choosing the problems, discovering the formulas, running all computations, and writing the manuscript, was carried out with extensive use of an AI system (Claude Code, by Anthropic) under the author's direction. It has not been peer reviewed. The author takes full responsibility for the content. Code: https://github.com/JacobGoodchild/findformula

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.