Aug 2026· Journal of the Acoustical Society of America· Vol 159, pp. A20-A20· 0 citations
TL;DR
It is suggested that reducing functional asymmetry through novel programming approaches or training might improve spatial-hearing benefits with CIs by reducing functional asymmetry through novel programming approaches or training.
Abstract
More people are receiving cochlear implant (CIs) to partially restore hearing to both ears, either in cases of bilateral (BI-CI) or unilateral hearing loss (single-sided deafness, SSD-CI). Compared to monaural listening, this usually improves spatial-hearing abilities like sound localization and spatial release from masking (increased speech recognition for a target talker spatially separated from a masker). Yet spatial-hearing benefits with CIs are smaller than with acoustic hearing in both ears, and they appear to diminish with increasing functional asymmetry. We hypothesize that diminished spatial-hearing benefits are partly attributable to non-auditory-exclusive selective-attention abilities, whereby some individuals exhibit particular difficulty attending to a degraded target source in the presence of less degraded interfering source. We present data from several experiments in real and simulated human BI-CI and SSD-CI listeners that support this hypothesis. Measurements include behavioral binaural unmasking of speech and dichotic listening, pupillometry (an objective index of listening effort), and non-auditory cognitive tests. The results suggest that reducing functional asymmetry through novel programming approaches or training might improve spatial-hearing benefits with CIs. [The views expressed in this abstract are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of War or U.S. Government.]
Preserved low-to-mid frequency hearing in the poorer-hearing ear was associated with better localization in patients with SSD when the stimulus contained rich spatial cues, such as broadband noise.
Seungik Jeon, Hyo-Jeong Lee· The journal of international...· 0 citations
Cochlear implant users do not experience spatial hearing with the same accuracy or acuity as typical hearing listeners. Two standard measures of spatial hearing are sound localization error and speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in spatially separated noise. While sound localization requires a complicated setup, SRTs m...
Stephen R. Dennison, Jenna Felder, Caroline K. Paroby et al.· Journal of the Acoustical So...· 0 citations
OBJECTIVES
Adults typically receive only one cochlear implant (CI). Bimodal fitting (i.e. a contralateral hearing aid) is recommended when aidable hearing remains. However, standard hearing aids typically function independently from a CI, requiring the user to integrate disparate signals. Integrated bimodal technology...
Manal Alfakhri, N. Campbell, Ben Lineton et al.· Cochlear Implants Internatio...· 0 citations
OBJECTIVES
Children with mild bilateral hearing loss (CHL), defined as having thresholds between 20 and 40 dB HL, experience difficulties conversing in adverse acoustic conditions with background noise, despite having near-normal speech perception in quiet. Mixed evidence of hearing aid benefit among CHL has led to gui...
Xin Zhou, Sriram Boothalingam, Qing-Qing Meng et al.· Ear and Hearing· 0 citations
Hearing aid users often report that some everyday sounds are abnormally intrusive or salient. This issue may stem from distorted coding of sound features due to peripheral impairments and/or hearing aid processing. This study investigates whether aided hearing-impaired (aHI) listeners experience (1) abnormal loudness p...
Armand Schwarz, P. Avan, P. Susini et al.· Trends in Hearing· 0 citations
Speech understanding in noise remains challenging for cochlear implant (CI) users. To address this, microphone directionality has been integrated into speech processors to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. Despite demonstrated benefits for users of non-tonal language, studies investigating its efficacy for users o...