Aug 2026· Journal of Studies in Science and Mathematics Education· Vol 6, pp. 362–369· 1 citation· 9 references
TL;DR
It is argued that the ease of fabricating data, generating lab reports, and obscuring AI use necessitates a rethinking of how ethical scientific attitudes are taught, assessed and modelled in science education research.
Abstract
The
rapid adoption of Gen-AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini in science education
has created unprecedented opportunities for learning, while simultaneously
threatening core ethical scientific attitudes. This conceptual paper examines
how honesty and integrity, as foundational values in science, are being tested
in an AI-mediated educational environment. The paper argues that the ease of
fabricating data, generating lab reports, and obscuring AI use necessitates a
rethinking of how ethical scientific attitudes are taught, assessed and
modelled in science education research. Based on literature in science ethics
and educational technology, a three-dimensional ‘‘AI Disclosure-Accountability
Model’’ is proposed emphasizing truthfulness in reporting, transparency in AI
use, and responsibility for verifying AI outputs. The paper further discusses
pedagogical strategies, assessment redesigns, and institutional policies needed
to foster honesty and integrity among students and researchers. It concludes
that intentional cultivation of ethical attitudes is essential to preserve the
credibility and integrity of science education in the age of Gen-AI
The study highlights the need for ethical training, policies, and clear guidelines to ensure responsible use of GAI, promoting innovation while safeguarding academic values.
H. Albadi· International journal of com...· 0 citations
Examination of the legal and ethical perspectives of use of generative AI in academic backgrounds through a doctrinal and thematic analysis of recent scholarship, institutional guidance and evolving governing instruments concludes that transparent disclosure frameworks, redesigned assessment practices and layered governance models offer a more secure path forward.
Unknown authors· Revue Internationale du Law...· 0 citations
A research-based approach to make the abstract concrete, metaphorically speaking, by putting the concepts into a wheelbarrow so the authors can push them around more successfully in the context of the higher education institutional and classroom settings.
Janet L Hanson· International Journal of Lea...· 0 citations
This study explores perceptions and practices of AI ethics among higher education students at Banaras Hindu University, using the AI and Ethics Perception Scale (AEPS) dimensions, including transparency, accountability, privacy, fairness, and human oversight, as a conceptual framework.
It is concluded that in order for undergraduate education to continue to be relevant in a society where AI is pervasive, governance must change toward process-oriented evaluation and relational originality.
Joe Mutebi, Brian Mugisha, Ibrahim Adabara et al.· F1000Research· 0 citations
Tunisian higher education is operating in something close to a policy vacuum on AI-assisted writing, and it is essential to formulate codes of ethics that incorporate the notion of so-called AI literacy into the educational process of teaching research methods and academic writing.
Mongi Aloui· Review of Artificial Intelli...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.