This study investigates whether phonological similarity alone can drive cross-linguistic activation across non-native languages in trilingual lexical processing. Using a masked priming lexical decision task, we examined phonological priming from English (L2) to Korean (L3) in Chinese–English–Korean unbalanced trilinguals. Critically, homophone pairs were employed to minimize semantic and orthographic overlap, allowing for a clearer examination of phonological priming than previous studies relying on cognates. The results showed a robust phonological priming effect between non-native languages, suggesting that phonological information alone can trigger cross-linguistic activation. In addition, proficiency was treated as a continuous variable, with L2 and L3 proficiency showing dissociable effects: higher L3 proficiency facilitated lexical access, whereas higher L2 proficiency was associated with slower response times, suggesting increased cross-language competition. Overall, the present study demonstrates that phonological representations are shared between non-native languages, supporting non-selective cross-linguistic activation in trilingual lexical processing, and highlights the important role of proficiency in lexical processing. These findings are discussed within the framework of bilingual and trilingual models of lexical access and provide further insights into the development of more refined models of trilingual lexical processing.
Abstract This study investigates the semantic representation of English psych verbs in Chinese-English bilinguals (CEBs) and how L2 proficiency modulates this process. A total of 180 CEBs, divided into low-, intermediate-, and high-proficiency groups, completed two masked priming experiments. Experiment 1 examined intr...
Although prior research suggests that suprasegmental phonological awareness contributes to English learners’
acquisition of lexical stress, less attention has been paid to morphological awareness and how learners’ first language (L1)
shapes this ability, particularly since morpho-phonological cues change how stress...
Ka-Keung Lee, Magdalena Ivok, H. Yeung· Journal of Second Language P...· 0 citations
Most researchers assume language non-selective lexical access: when a target is presented, words sharing form and/or meaning are activated regardless of language and may compete for identification. Lexical decision studies have explored the lateral inhibition (LI) mechanism using orthographic substitution neighbors...
A. I. Fernandes, J. Haro, T. Dijkstra et al.· International Journal of Bil...· 0 citations
Introduction: Multilingual speakers frequently report that operating in a different language involves more than a change in grammatical system. The phenomenon at issue is linguistic frame switching (LFS): the involuntary reorganisation of cognitive, emotional, and identity-relevant schemas when a multilingual speaker m...
Judith Zangerle· Academia Neuroscience and Br...· 0 citations
Second language (L2) processing engages both language-specific and domain-general control systems, yet how these systems vary with L2 proficiency remains unclear. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine neural activity during L2 English processing in Korean–English (K-E) bilinguals across three...
Joonwoo Kim, Jiyoun Choi, Yeonji Baik et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
This study employs the comparative-inductive method prevalent in research on cross-linguistic transfer within multilingual production. Taking Chinese, English and Japanese writing samples collected from nine student participants as research data, it conducts cross-text comparisons to investigate lexical errors in tri-l...
Ma You, Hui Shi· Social Sciences and Humaniti...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.