A systematic landscape analysis of global BsAb clinical trials in breast cancer to identify emerging trends and strategic development gaps is presented and 124 valid BsAb trials are identified.
Abstract
, Breast cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in women worldwide, with over 2.3 million new cases annually [1]. despite the success of endocrine therapies, chemotherapy, and monoclonal antibodies (e.g., trastuzumab, pertuzumab), a significant therapeutic gap persists for advanced, metastatic, and treatment-refractory cases [2]. resistance mechanisms and tumor heterogeneity necessitate the development of next-generation biologics [3]. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) offer a transformative approach by simultaneously engaging two different epitopes, thereby redirecting immune effector cells (t/NK cells) to the tumor microenvironment or dual-inhibiting compensatory signaling pathways [4]. here, we present a systematic landscape analysis of global BsAb clinical trials in breast cancer to identify emerging trends and strategic development gaps. data was extracted from trialtrove, a curated clinical trial intelligence platform that combines records from Clinicaltrials.gov, Who iCtrP, and eU Clinical trials register [5,6]. We focused on the period from 2015 to october 14, 2025. the year 2015 was selected as the starting point to mark the “modern era” of bispecific antibody (BsAb) research and development, a booming wave driven by the FdA approval of the first t-cell engager on december 3, 2014 [7]. We queried for drug type: Bispecific Antibody disease: Breast until october 14th, 2025, and found 164 records. We searched interventional clinical trials related to breast cancer and BsAbs, then manually screened records for eligibility. inclusion criteria were: (i) breast cancer as the target disease; (ii) an interventional design evaluating a BsAb either as monotherapy or in combination; (iii) any clinical phase; and (iv) any geographic region. exclusion criteria were observational studies, preclinical studies, duplicate records, and withdrawn records without usable trial information. We excluded 3 observational studies, 15 trials before 2015, and 22 single target investigations, resulting in 124 valid BsAb trials. two reviewers independently verified target combinations, clinical phase, sponsor type, and geographic distribution, with discrepancies resolved by discussion.
Despite significant advances in early detection and therapeutic strategies, breast cancer (BC) continues to pose a major public health challenge.
The treatment of HER2-positive (HER2 +) BC has evolved substantially over recent years with the advent of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs). Clinical progress has been significantly accelerated by a deeper understanding of the immune-regulatory properties of this subtype and its interactions with the tumor microenvironment.
Despite the availability of effective HER2-targeted therapies, approximately one-third of patients develops resistance, highlighting the need for novel and more durable treatment strategies. Indeed, while current treatments have shown promising efficacy by promoting a “passive immune response,” they are associated with the emergence of resistant clones.
Conversely, vaccine-based therapies are designed to elicit a durable “active immune response” by presenting tumor-associated antigens that stimulate the host immune system to recognize and eliminate malignant cells. This approach has the potential to generate long-lasting immunological memory, preventing recurrence, disease progression, and the emergence of immune-evasive tumor variants.
This review provides a comprehensive overview of cancer vaccines strategies for HER2 + BC with emphasis on their mechanisms, advantages, limitations, and their current developmental status. We explore diverse delivery platforms, including peptide/protein-based, nucleic acid, and cell-based vaccines. The clinical utility of these strategies is assessed across different disease settings: from prevention and interception in pre-invasive lesions, to the (neo)adjuvant treatment of early-stage BC and the management of advanced metastatic disease. While advanced-stage BC often presents an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that hinders vaccine efficacy, early-stage disease offers a more favorable immunological milieu for inducing robust and durable T-cell responses. Furthermore, we discuss emerging innovations such as neoantigen discovery, next-generation adjuvants (e.g., TLR and STING agonists), and novel combinatorial approaches with checkpoint inhibitors to overcome immune evasion.
Although most BC vaccines remain under clinical investigation, they represent a promising frontier for achieving disease control and the coming decade is expected to yield pivotal insights into their clinical utility and therapeutic potential.
A. Caltavituro, C. Martinelli, M. Palleschi et al.· Journal of Experimental &...· 0 citations
Breast cancer (BC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality and a major contributor to disease burden among women worldwide. Although PD‑1/PD‑L1‑targeting immune checkpoint inhibitors have become a standard treatment for certain triple‑negative breast cancer subgroups, their use across the broader BC population is limited by intrinsic resistance, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), and treatment‑related adverse effects. The present review offers a comprehensive synthesis of the immunotherapeutic paradigm in BC, spanning ICIs, adoptive cellular therapies (CAR-T, CAR-NK, CAR-M, TIL, TCR-T, and CIK cells), and emerging immune modulators. We critically evaluate pivotal clinical trials, discuss cross-cutting challenges—including biomarker development, therapy resistance, and the practical limitations of cellular products—and highlight rational combinatorial strategies. By contrasting the translational readiness of diverse modalities and outlining a framework for personalized therapy, this review aims to inform future research and clinical practice in harnessing immunity against BC.
Ali Mussa, Mahasin Hamid, M. Talib et al.· Journal of Translational Med...· 0 citations
This review synthesizes literature spanning 1990-2026 on advances in ADC design and their clinical and translational implementation in breast cancer to support reframing antigen selection as a system-level challenge, supported by delivery-focused engineering, precision-medicine-driven trial design, and adaptive methodology.
Callum Chapman, A. Cheung, G. B. Armstrong et al.· Expert Opinion on Drug Deliv...· 0 citations
Breast cancer (BC) remains the most common malignant tumor in women worldwide and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Despite therapeutic advances, patients with advanced BC, particularly triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), still face limited effective treatment options. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a compelling strategy that combines precise tumor targeting with cytotoxic payloads, effectively bridging targeted delivery with microenvironmental disruption. Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd), a Trop-2-targeted ADC, has demonstrated encouraging clinical activity. Preclinical evidence suggests that Dato-DXd may modulate the tumor microenvironment (TME) through potential induction of immunogenic cell death (ICD), providing a biological rationale for investigating synergistic combinations with immunotherapy.
A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using the PubMed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials databases. The inclusion criteria targeted relevant clinical studies published between 2024 and 2026. Ultimately, after a thorough analysis, one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and one single-arm study met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review.
Data analysis from the Phase III TROPION-Breast01 trial demonstrated that Dato-DXd significantly improved objective response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) compared to investigator’s choice chemotherapy in patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer. In the Phase I TROPION-PanTumor01 trial, Dato-DXd showed promising clinical activity in both HR+/HER2- breast cancer and TNBC cohorts. Regarding safety, Dato-DXd was associated with a lower incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events compared to standard chemotherapy in the randomized setting, although low-grade toxicities such as stomatitis and nausea remained common.
Dato-DXd demonstrates robust clinical activity in patients with BC, providing superior disease control with a favorable safety profile compared to conventional chemotherapy. Beyond direct tumor cell ablation, its mechanism of action includes a potent bystander killing effect, while preclinical data suggest that the induction of ICD may contribute to reshaping a heterogeneous TME. Future research is needed to correlate these preclinical mechanistic hypotheses with clinical outcomes. The limited number of available RCTs and Real-World Evidence (RWE) studies underscores the need to raise awareness and conduct further research to identify predictive biomarkers and evaluate combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors to optimize personalized treatment regimens.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/
, identifier CRD420261408796.
Julia Piekarz, Natalia Picheta, Jakub Pobideł et al.· Frontiers in Immunology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.