Skip to content
Open access

Binocular Summation in Healthy Presbyopic Adults: Contrast Sensitivity and Defocus Curves

Sep 2026 · Journal of Personalized Medicine · Vol 16, pp. 465 · 0 citations · 20 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Binocularity consistently enhances visual performance in presbyopic adults, for contrast sensitivity and, with a pattern of significant improvement concentrated in the central defocus range, for visual acuity, supporting a more personalized evaluation of presbyopia.

Abstract

Background/Objective: Binocular summation, the improvement in visual performance under binocular compared with monocular viewing, depends on the visual task and the degree of optical degradation of the retinal image. Its behavior across the full defocus curve in presbyopia remains poorly characterized. The purpose is to quantify binocular summation in healthy presbyopic adults by assessing contrast sensitivity (CS) at intermediate and near distances and by comparing monocular and binocular defocus curves to evaluate the effect of binocularity on depth of focus, the area under the curve (AUC), and the binocular summation ratio (BSR). Methods: Thirty healthy presbyopic participants (mean age 53.7 ± 5.7 years, range 45–64) were included in this observational, cross-sectional study. CS was measured with the Pelli–Robson chart at 1 m and 40 cm, and monocular and binocular defocus curves were obtained from −3.50 D to +1.50 D in 0.50 D steps. BSR, AUC and depth of focus at the 0.2 and 0.1 logMAR thresholds were calculated. Monocular and binocular values were compared with paired t-tests, applying a Bonferroni correction. Results: Binocular CS was significantly higher than monocular CS at both distances (adjusted p < 0.025), with a large, distance-independent BSR (1.68 at 1 m, 1.69 at 40 cm). BSR exceeded unity at every defocus level (10–21% gain), but after correction the binocular advantage in visual acuity remained significant only within the central range (−0.50 D to +1.00 D). At the participant level, binocularity increased the AUC at the 0.1 logMAR threshold (+50.5%, p = 0.037, d = 0.40), whereas the increase at the 0.2 logMAR threshold (+52.2%) did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.107). Conclusions: Binocularity consistently enhances visual performance in presbyopic adults, for contrast sensitivity and, with a pattern of significant improvement concentrated in the central defocus range, for visual acuity, supporting a more personalized evaluation of presbyopia.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Differences in Preferred Retinal Loci of Fixation in Binocular and Monocular Vision

Binocular viewing not only enhances oculomotor stability through smaller microsaccades and tighter drift but also actively shifts fixation to a different retinal location compared to monocular viewing.

Maximilian Freiberg, Aleksandr Gutnikov, C. Meltendorf et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Binocular summation of suprathreshold color

Two eyes are better than one for detecting both achromatic and chromatic contrast, an advantage termed binocular summation. It is widely believed that binocular summation is mediated by neurons that sum the signals from the two eyes. While binocular summation for luminance-defined stimuli has been measured for both thr...

F. Kingdom, Donald Chang, Obai Osman · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STEREOPSIS AND FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE IN ADULTS WITH VISUAL IMPAIRMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Background: Stereopsis is binocular information of depth which may contribute to visuomotor coordination and/or daily activities. But standard visual acuity and visual field testing might not be adequate to assess for the functional effects of binocular fixation dysfunction. Objective: To systematically review the lite...

Arghyadeep Haldar, Puja Sarbajna · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Effect of Working Distance on Wesson Card Fixation Disparity and Its Clinical Predictors in Symptomatic Patients

Aim Fixation disparity (FD) is a sensitive marker of binocular vision stress and is often assessed in patients with asthenopia. Working distance alters accommodative and vergence demands. However, its effect on FD under routine clinical settings is not well established. Purpose To investigate the effect of working dist...

T. I. Metsing, G. Tamenti · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.