Back to feed
Preprint

Hallucinations Leave a Grounding Signature:Verifier-Guided Decoding for Selective Object Correction

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 33 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Verifier-Guided Decoding (VGD), a decoding framework in which a lightweight verifier examines each emerging object mention, rolls back the KV cache when the mention is identified as high risk, suppresses the object and its synonyms, and regenerates the affected continuation, achieves state-of-the-art object hallucination reduction.

Abstract

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) often hallucinate objects that are absent from an image. Despite recent progress, existing mitigation methods still lack reliable object-level grounding diagnostics and therefore tend to apply coarse-grained interventions, which can impair visual understanding, shorten responses, and reduce coverage of genuinely grounded objects. The key challenge is thus to detect, during generation, whether each emerging object mention is supported by reliable visual evidence, so that hallucination can be mitigated selectively. Yet output confidence reflects next-token plausibility rather than visual support, allowing language priors to make absent objects appear certain. We show that the missing diagnostic evidence is encoded in an Intrinsic Grounding Signature (IGS), a distributed signed attention pattern that remains informative for such confident hallucinations. Based on IGS, we propose Verifier-Guided Decoding (VGD), a decoding framework in which a lightweight verifier examines each emerging object mention, rolls back the KV cache when the mention is identified as high risk, suppresses the object and its synonyms, and regenerates the affected continuation. Because VGD intervenes only on object mentions identified as high risk, it reduces object hallucination while preserving the model's original visual understanding and grounded object coverage. Experiments on CHAIR and AMBER-G show that VGD achieves state-of-the-art object hallucination reduction: at @rec90, it cuts AMBER-G CHAIR by 43.6\% while retaining 99.6\% of grounded-object coverage, and reduces CHAIR-MSCOCO CHAIR$_i$/CHAIR$_s$ by 37.0\%/30.4\% without shortening captions.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

TruthLens: Object Hallucination Detection via Self-Evaluating Truthfulness Scores in LVLMs

TruthLens is a self-evaluation framework that teaches the LM head to expose a per-object truthfulness signal without any auxiliary model or additional inference cost, and generalizes effectively to benchmarks with substantially larger label spaces.

Yanqi Wu, Runhe Lai, Xinhua Lu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Role-Break in Attention Heads: Understanding and Detecting Hallucinations in VLMs

A lightweight linear detector is built on top of Role-Break that requires no fine-tuning of the VLM, whose feature dimension stays below 5,000 and reaches an average AUROC of 93.23 across six VLMs and four benchmarks.

Mingyu Wang, Weilin Jin, Wenbo Li et al. · 0 citations

RIVS: Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models via Representation Intervention on Visual Grounding Shift

This work studies hallucination from the perspective of dynamic representation shift during generation and proposes an online projection-based intervention on intermediate hidden states to suppress the hallucination-related directions, mitigating hallucinations while preserving language quality.

Xuanyu Yin, Xiaoye Qu, ∗. WeiWei · 0 citations
Jun 2026

Detecting Clinical Hallucinations in LVLMs via Counterfactual Visual Grounding Uncertainty

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) are increasingly used for clinical image understanding, yet they remain vulnerable to \emph{hallucinations}--producing textual findings or attributes not supported by the image. We present a vision-traceable hallucination detection framework that audits arbitrary LVLM responses via visual evidence grounding, requiring neither modification nor internal access to the hidden states of LVLMs. Given an LVLM response, we extract visually verifiable entities and use a medical-domain-adapted Qwen-VL grounding verifier to localize each entity on the input image. To enhance the robustness of our detection method, we introduce a counterfactual entity perturbation method and estimate visual evidence uncertainty by contrasting factual and counterfactual grounding results. Specifically, we compute an entity-level uncertainty score from the positive confidence, counterfactual confidence, and their grounding overlap for binary hallucination decision-making. Experiments on multiple medical imaging modalities and LVLM backbones demonstrate that our method consistently improves hallucination detection performance over recent baselines, while providing interpretable localization evidence and strong cross-model transferability. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/Agentic-CliniAI/CounterVHD.

Xiao Song, Haonan Qin, Zhaoxu Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Jun 2026

AURORA: Asymmetry and Update-Induced Rotation for Robust Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models

This work proposes AURORA, a novel hallucination detection framework that shifts the focus from static representations to the weight-gradient dynamics of LLMs, and achieves strong hallucination detection performance across four model families and four benchmark datasets.

Z. Zhang, Hainan Zhang, Zhiming Zheng · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Decomposed Entailment for Factuality Checking and Hallucination Detection

The reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs) is often compromised by factual inconsistencies, including hallucinations---cases where generated content is not supported by the underlying source. We present HallDetect, a lightweight, reference-free, and black-box framework for hallucination detection that we evaluate not only on summarization but across a broader range of source-grounded generation settings. HallDetect builds on decomposition-based factuality evaluation: generated content is decomposed into atomic claims, each verified by a compact encoder-based entailment model through a contrastive formulation over a multi-scale library of source chunks, and aggregated with an asymmetric score in which a single confidently contradicted claim flags the response. Under a controlled protocol in which all methods share the same 4-bit quantized backbones and consumer-grade hardware budget, HallDetect outperforms comparably resourced generative and embedding-based baselines on three of four benchmarks while remaining stable across backbone families, and yields a claim-to-span audit trail that localizes each error.

Achir Oukelmoun, N. Semmar, Gäel de Chalendar · 0 citations