Recovery-centered outcomes across surgical specialties are synthesized, suggesting length of stay and operative duration are procedure- and care-pathway-dependent outcomes, and Frailty, comorbidity, surgical complexity and team experience are essential to interpretation.
Robotic surgery depends on effective bedside assistance, yet staffing models vary between physician and non-physician assistants. We systematically reviewed comparative evidence evaluating these models in robotic abdominal and pelvic surgery. A PRISMA compliant systematic review was performed. PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDL...
R. Gosavi, Baxter Smith, Chun-Yin Yan et al.· Journal of Robotic Surgery· 1 citation
Findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than definitive evidence of superiority or equivalence, but larger, prospective, multi-centre studies with standardised outcome definitions and robust adjustment for confounding are needed to clarify the comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness of roboti...
H. Bharadwaj, E. Danda, S. H. Ali et al.· Medical Science· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Single-port (SP) robotic surgery has emerged as a reduced-access alternative to conventional multiport (MP) robotic colorectal surgery. However, its comparative perioperative benefits remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared outcomes between SP and MP robotic colorectal surgery....
Vitória Maia Corrêa, Fernanda de Moraes Nava, F. Kelher et al.· Journal of laparoendoscopic...· 0 citations
The comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer remains debated. We performed an updated meta-analysis through June 2026, with cross-validation against published systematic reviews. PubMed was searched for comparative studies of laparoscopic versus robotic colorectal surgery....
Yu Han, Li-Jiang Sha· Journal of Robotic Surgery· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
