It is confirmed that Kartalinia is distinct from Bituminaria, and other genera in the tribe Psoraleeae, and supports the morphological and karyological data used to circumscribe this genus.
Abstract
The genus
Kartalinia
was described to accommodate a single, obscure species,
Psoralea acaulis
, based on its unique morphology and karyology. No concerted molecular phylogenetic studies were available for this species at the time, and therefore its phylogenetic position was uncertain. We aim to establish its phylogenetic relationships, using a combination of nuclear and plastid markers, testing hypotheses on its previous placement as a subgenus in
Bituminaria
. Evolutionary patterns of characters used in taxonomic diagnoses were evaluated to identify synapomorphies for clades. Silica‐dried leaf material representing the morphological and geographical range of
Bituminaria
sensu lato were used for genomic DNA extractions following the standard CTAB protocol. Sanger sequencing was performed for the nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and plastid
matK
,
trnS‐trnG
, and
trnL‐trnF
regions. Additional sequences representing all Psoraleeae genera were downloaded from GenBank and incorporated into our sequence alignments. Maximum‐likelihood phylogenies were inferred using IQ‐TREE, separately for nuclear and plastid gene regions, and concatenation was not performed due to phylogenetic incongruence. Diagnostic morphological characters were mapped on the phylogeny, using parsimony, to unravel their evolutionary patterns. Both phylogenies resolved
Kartalinia
as sister to the rest of the tribe Psoraleeae, although the evolutionary history of the tribe requires further investigation as previous studies on biogeography and molecular dating excluded sequence data for
Kartalinia
. This study thus confirms that
Kartalinia
is distinct from
Bituminaria
, and other genera in the tribe, and supports the morphological and karyological data used to circumscribe this genus. A taxonomic revision of
Bituminaria
is also presented, with 17 species recognised and illustrated, including the description of four new species and three new combinations.
Mariosousa
, a genus segregated from Acacia sensu lato due to morphological and genetic distinctions, is hypothesized to be monophyletic but requires further investigation with expanded taxon sampling and integrated analyses. This study aimed to test the monophyly of
Mariosousa
, evaluate its infrageneric relationships, and reassess morphological characters within a robust molecular phylogenetic framework. Molecular analyses were performed on all members of the genus
Mariosousa
and select taxa from its sister genus
Parasenegalia
and close ally
Senegalia
. Multiple molecular markers were used, including nuclear ITS and two chloroplast loci (
psbA-trnH
and
trnL-F
), to infer relationships substantiated with multiple accessions of several taxa. Additionally, a data matrix composed of fifty-eight morphological characters was analyzed by hierarchical clustering and ordination approaches to assess taxonomic utility and potential homoplasy. Results confirm the monophyly of
Mariosousa
and clarify relationships within the genus, although some incongruences are observed between the gene trees. Overall, we contribute fifty-seven new DNA sequences for fifteen taxa and confirm the sister relationship of
Parasenegalia
to
Mariosousa
. Our phenetic analyses resulted in species clustering according to genera, which agreed with molecular findings, but we found no simple synapomorphies that correlated with taxonomic delimitations as discussed. The combined phylogenetic and phenetic study advances our understanding of evolutionary relationships and morphological features for closely allied monophyletic sister taxa
Mariosousa
and
Parasenegalia
and have implications for future revisions of related mimosoid genera, such as
Senegalia
and
Pseudosenegalia
.
C. Riggins, John E. E. Ebinger, D. Seigler· Systematic Botany· 0 citations
The genus Conophymacris belongs to Acridoidea, Dericorythidae, and Conophyminae. It is an endemic brachypterous grasshopper genus in China, with 11 described species primarily distributed in Yunnan and Sichuan Provinces. Despite previous taxonomic and phylogenetic studies on Conophymacris, there remain many doubts about this genus at various taxonomic levels. In this study, based on 56 newly sequenced mitochondrial genome sequences from 13 species, combined with mitochondrial genome data of 29 species retrieved from NCBI, phylogenetic relationships between Conophymacris and related genera were reconstructed. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) methods, based on two mitochondrial datasets: 13 protein-coding genes (13PCGs) and the combined dataset of 13PCGs + 22tRNA + 2rRNA. Integrating molecular phylogenetic, morphological, biogeographical and genetic distance evidence, the following conclusions are drawn: The genus Conophymacris should be removed from Dericorythidae and placed in Acrididae. Five new synonyms are proposed: Xiangelilacris Zheng, Huang & Zhou, 2008, syn. nov. = Conophymacris Willemse, 1933; Xiangelilacris zhongdianensis Zheng, Huang & Zhou, 2008, syn. nov. = Conophymacris xianggelilaensis Zheng, Niu & Shi, 2009, syn. nov. = Conophymacris nigrofemora Liang & Lin, 1993; Conophymacris reni Ye, Shen, Jia & Yin, 2021, syn. nov. = Conophymacris cangshanensis Zheng & Mao, 1996; Conophymacris yunnanensis Zheng, 1977 syn. nov. = Conophymacris chinensis Willemse, 1933.
Gonatobotryum is an anamorphic fungus reported mainly as a saprophyte, parasite, or endophyte. The genus has traditionally been identified based on morphological features, with its phylogenetic placement remaining uncertain due to the lack of molecular data. During the analysis of fungi obtained from mangrove sediments in Brazil, nine isolates were morphologically identified as Gonatobotryum and subsequently analysed using the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, including the intervening 5.8S nRNA gene and the nuclear ribosomal RNA large subunit (LSU) gene, leading to the description of a new species, Gonatobotryum mangrovei. Additionally, the type material of Gonatobotryum bahiense was re-evaluated regarding its phylogenetic placement. Here, we propose a new combination, Ophiostoma bahiense, to place this species within the genus. Our results clarify the phylogenetic position of Gonatobotryum and expand the current understanding of fungi in mangrove environments.
Karen B. E. Carmo, T. G. Carvalho, C. S. Oliveira et al.· Brazilian Journal of Microbi...· 0 citations
Earlier phylogenetic analyses of the family Thymelaeaceae using combined plastid (
matK
,
rbcL
,
rps16,
trnL‐F
) and nuclear (ITS) regions showed that the African‐Malagasy genus
Gnidia
was extensively polyphyletic in relation to the southern African genera
Lachnaea
,
Passerina
and
Struthiola
, as well as to other Southern Hemisphere genera such as
Drapetes
,
Kelleria
and
Pimelea
. We present here a robust and well‐sampled phylogenetic analysis of the subfamily Thymelaeoideae, with sampling in
Gnidia
increased to 76% of the species, to better resolve the polyphyly of the genus
.
Our analysis retrieved seven lineages of
Gnidia
nested in four independent evolutionary clades within the “Gnidia group” of the subfamily Thymelaeoideae. We analysed the options available for re‐circumscribing
Gnidia
as a monophyletic genus, with secondary considerations of nomenclatural stability, phylogenetic and biogeographic information, and ease of identification. The option that we present retains the traditionally recognized genera
Drapetes
,
Kelleria
,
Lachnaea
,
Passerina
,
Pimelea
and
Struthiola
through the recognition of six lineages of
Gnidia
at the generic level. We propose that
Gnidia
be retained as a monotypic genus, including only the type of the genus name
G. pinifolia
. We reinstate the four previously recognized genera
Basutica
,
Craspedostoma
,
Gnidiopsis
and
Thymelina
and recognize the two new genera
Epichroxantha
and
Phidia
for the remaining two lineages of continental African
Gnidia
for which no names were available, plus the monotypic
Zacharia
for an anomalous Malagasy species that was previously excluded from
Lasiosiphon.
A taxonomic key and descriptions are provided for the genera in the “Gnidia group”. We also provide the necessary new combinations for names of
Gnidia
species now transferred to other genera.
O. D. Olaniyan, J. Boatwright, A. Magee et al.· Taxon· 0 citations
Museum collections offer valuable resources for phylogenetic research, especially in taxonomically challenging groups. Here, we present a phylogenetic study of the South American Apocynaceae subtribe Orthosiinae, based on sequencing 835 nuclear genes and chloroplast genomes from ~120 species using a family‐specific probe set and multiple herbarium samples per species. Our results confirm generic relationships within Orthosiinae with
Monsanima
(2 species) sister to
Scyphostelma
(>50 species), and
Jobinia
(25 species) +
Orthosia
(55 species). Data were processed with the HybPhyloMaker pipeline, providing a reproducible framework for phylogenetic reconstructions using concatenation and coalescent‐based methods. The final dataset comprised 204 samples, 810 nuclear genes (1.2 Mb) and complete chloroplast genomes (0.16 Mb) after excluding samples with signals of admixture. Phylogenetic analysis identified several cryptic lineages with little morphological differentiation, highlighting the need for further systematic research in the Andes. Evolutionary placement of 107 additional samples confirmed
Monsanima
as sister to the rest of Orthosiinae. Divergence‐time estimates placed the crown age of Orthosiinae at ~13 Ma. Morphological analysis revealed high variability in leaf and floral traits traditionally used for taxon delimitation but also identified floral characters that are diagnostic for generic identification. Ancestral state reconstructions show no clear directional changes in leaf morphology, whereas several floral traits tend to evolve toward smaller sizes along the youngest branches of the phylogeny. Our integrated museomic approach contributes to a better understanding of evolutionary patterns and taxonomic relationships in this still understudied lineage of South American Apocynaceae.
Yam M. Pineda, M. Kandziora, María Pinilla Vargas et al.· Taxon· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.