DSAgentBench is introduced, the first benchmark to evaluate whether agents can automate full data-science workflows inside real computer environments, and reveals a substantial capability gap between current agentic systems and real data-science workflows.
Abstract
Real-world data science involves long-horizon workflows that span data wrangling, exploration, modeling, visualization, and validation, and require coordinated use of tools such as notebooks, IDEs, terminals, browsers, and databases within real operating environments. Yet existing benchmarks lack real-computer interaction and do not evaluate whether agents can execute complete end-to-end data-science workflows in realistic computing environments, failing to capture the multi-stage, multi-tool nature of data-science practice. We introduce DSAgentBench, the first benchmark to evaluate whether agents can automate full data-science workflows inside real computer environments. DSAgentBench contains 275 diverse tasks covering the entire data-science life-cycle, reflecting the complexity and tool coordination required in practice. Each task requires grounding decisions in intermediate outputs and coordinated tool use, and includes a deterministic evaluator that verifies analytical correctness, visual outputs, and model performance rather than code-only execution. Our extensive experiments with 15 closed- and open-source models show that even the strongest agent, Claude-4.6-Sonnet, achieves only 56.70% task success, while all open-source agents remain below 1%, frequently failing at tool orchestration, OS grounding, and multi-step reasoning. These results reveal a substantial capability gap between current agentic systems and real data-science workflows, positioning DSAgentBench as a foundation for developing grounded, verifiable, autonomous data-science agents. We release DSAgentBench at https://github.com/vis-nlp/DSAgentBench.
DataClawEval is introduced, the first comprehensive benchmark designed specifically to evaluate the end-to-end task completion capabilities of autonomous agents in real-world data engineering scenarios, and it comprises 100 rigorous, end-to-end tasks spanning five execution engines.
The results suggest that robust Agentic EDA requires not only stronger models but also structured tool interfaces, persistent design context, controlled execution, and process-level evaluation.
DuMateBench, a real-session benchmark reconstructed from anonymized and privacy-screened user sessions collected from a large-scale production agent platform, is introduced, showing that performance under environmental perturbations is jointly shaped by the capabilities of the LLM and the surrounding agent framework.
Zechun Niu, Yu-Kun Zhao, Jia-Xin Zhang et al.· 0 citations
This work systematically study AI products with demonstrated adoption, together with their product workflows and users, to identify real-world tasks for which AI has established practical demand across diverse professional domains and establishes StartupBench as an empirical measure of progress toward E2E completions of real-world user tasks.
Experiments on public benchmarks and real-world industrial BI workloads show that QwenPaw-Data improves both verifiable data access capability and higher-level analytical quality, offering a practical foundation for reliable, traceable, and continuously improving enterprise data agents.
Opti-Agent-Bench is introduced, an end-to-end benchmark that evaluates Large Language Models across the complete optimization R&D pipeline, from understanding business-language descriptions through mathematical modeling, algorithm selection, and code implementation, to solution report generation.
Yongchang Fu, Xin Huang, Chengjun Dai et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.