Aug 2026· Geophysical Prospecting· Vol 74· 0 citations· 25 references
TL;DR
A deep‐learning‐based matching‐filtering framework is proposed, in which a lightweight neural network is trained to learn adaptive, data‐driven matching filters that map synthetic elastic wavefields towards the observed data.
Abstract
Elastic full waveform inversion (EFWI) aims to reconstruct high‐resolution elastic properties by minimizing the waveform misfit between observed and simulated multicomponent seismic data, yet its practical performance is often limited by cycle skipping and modelling errors that conventional misfit‐based methods cannot fully resolve. We propose a deep‐learning‐based matching‐filtering framework, in which a lightweight neural network is trained to learn adaptive, data‐driven matching filters that map synthetic elastic wavefields towards the observed data. Instead of directly enforcing waveform agreement, the learned filters absorb phase, amplitude and dispersion discrepancies arising from inaccurate initial models, elastic‐parameter trade‐offs and imperfect physics. The matching filters are optimized jointly with elastic parameters within an AD framework, enabling seamless gradient propagation through both the wave‐equation solver and the neural components. Numerical experiments on synthetic elastic models and field data demonstrate that the proposed approach significantly reduces cycle skipping and improves the recovery of P‐ and S‐wave velocities compared to conventional EFWI, particularly when the initial model is strongly biased. The results suggest that deep learning–based matching filtering provides a physically interpretable and computationally efficient pathway for robust elastic waveform inversion under realistic modelling uncertainties.
Elastic full-waveform inversion (EFWI) is a high-resolution inversion method that minimizes full-waveform misfit between synthetic and observed data under the seismic elastic wave equation. In practice, EFWI effectiveness depends strongly on the accuracy of the source wavelet and the initial models, as errors in either...
Q. Du, Zhaoqi Gao· Journal of Seismic Explorati...· 0 citations
Implicit full-waveform inversion (IFWI) has shown strong potential for seismic velocity reconstruction due to the implicit regularization of neural networks. However, conventional IFWI based on direct modeling represents multi-scale structures within a unified parameter space, where gradients associated with differen...
We propose a variational autoencoder framework to directly assess uncertainties in subsurface models produced by single‐ and multiparameter full waveform inversion (FWI). The new method does not require pretraining on labeled data, thus it significantly reduces computational cost and storage requirements. The framewo...
A. Elmeliegy, Mrinal K. Sen, A. Dhara et al.· Journal of Geophysical Resea...· 0 citations
Conventional gradient-based elastic full waveform inversion methods encounter challenges associated with local minima and trade-offs in multi-parameter inversion. To address these issues, we developed a new method, called the elastic Direct Waveform Inversion (eDWI) scheme. By explicitly enforcing the time-space caus...
Zhong-Han Liu, Yue-Su Jin, Zhen-Ning Ba et al.· Geophysics· 0 citations
The near‐surface shear‐wave velocity structure is crucial for geological engineering and near‐surface exploration. Surface wave inversion is a key technique for obtaining the velocity structure, but traditional methods suffer from limitations such as heavy reliance on the initial model, high computational cost, and s...