Accurate prediction of protein-protein interaction interfaces is critical for understanding molecular recognition and guiding therapeutic design. This study presents a comprehensive machine learning pipeline for predicting interface residues in permanent homodimeric protein complexes. Using a curated dataset of 1311 homodimers, we benchmarked six widely used machine learning algorithms and identified multilayer perceptron and XGBoost as top performers, achieving Matthews correlation coefficients (MCC) exceeding 0.93. To enhance interpretability and efficiency, we employed recursive feature elimination to derive a minimal set of six biologically meaningful features, including solvent accessibility, surface roughness, planarity, and average protrusion index, that retained high predictive power (MCC > 0.90). Structurally stratified models tailored to α-helical, β-strand, and membrane proteins demonstrated comparable or improved accuracy relative to generalized models, particularly when utilizing the reduced feature subset. As a preliminary demonstration of generalizability, we applied our approach to an external heterodimer complex (PDB ID: 9ETL). While limited to a single case study, the structurally specialized models maintained high accuracy, suggesting potential applicability beyond the training domain. Furthermore, our residue-level feature-driven models demonstrated highly competitive performance when compared against the baseline established by the general-purpose ColabFold pipeline. The results highlight the importance of structural context in interface prediction and demonstrate that compact, structure-aware models can achieve high accuracy while reducing computational complexity. This work provides a scalable, interpretable, and biologically informed approach to protein interface prediction, with implications for large-scale structural descriptor, drug target characterization, and protein engineering applications.
A category-stratified, statistically powered benchmark comparing pose prediction from receptor conformational ensembles against AlphaFold2, used as a matched static-structure baseline, across 29 protein–ligand systems spanning cryptic-pocket, induced-fit, water-mediated, and autoimmune-indication target classes is pres...
Ryan Varghese, Pooja Tiwary, Krishil Oswal· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Mapping the protein interactome is fundamental to understanding disease mechanisms and facilitating therapeutic development. Although protein language models (PLMs) such as ESM-2 have advanced protein-protein interaction (PPI) prediction, their high-dimensional representations remain difficult to connect to verifiable...
T. T. Nguyen, X. Mai, N. Nguyen· IEEE Access· 0 citations
It is found that, while AF3 can perform well in favourable settings, this performance is uneven across applications and its predictions and use of confidence metrics will depend strongly on the specific application area and must be interpreted with respect to training-set overlap.
O. Follonier, Yan Liu, Pablo Campomanes et al.· bioRxiv· 1 citation
Protein structure predictors achieve high single-state accuracy, but it remains unclear whether they can recover functionally relevant conformational ensembles or account for the presence of ligands and/or binding partners. Here, we benchmark AlphaFold3, Boltz-2, Chai-1, and BioEmu on four canonical multi-state protein...
Muhui Ye, Yu-Hong Wang, M. Brogi et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
HyBind-NN is developed, a multimodal graph neural network that integrates protein language models (PLMs) with 3D structural and dynamic datasets to predict protein–protein and protein–peptide affinity, and it is demonstrated that combining ESM-2 sequence embeddings with precise 3D Voronoi spatial geometry enables accur...
E. A. Bogdanova, A. Chernukhin, Alexey K. Shaytan· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
This work evaluated ImmuneBuilder, IgFold, AlphaFold3, GRAMM, and dyMEAN on 50 non-redundant humanized antibody–antigen complexes using multiple retained predictions and paired statistical testing, finding all three antibody structure predictors were accurate.
Ze-Yuan Yu, Ji-Lei Wu, Zi-Yao Ning et al.· Bioinformatics Advances· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.