Sep 2026· Farabi Tıp Dergisi· 0 citations· 29 references
TL;DR
These findings support individualized CBCT-based anatomical assessment before implant planning, periodontal evaluation, orthodontic treatment, orthodontic treatment, and dentoalveolar surgery.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate root morphology and buccal and lingual alveolar bone thickness of mandibular anterior teeth using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to compare these parameters among central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines.Material and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included CBCT images of 75 patients, comprising 450 mandibular anterior teeth. Root angle, buccolingual and mesiodistal root width, crown length, root length, buccal and lingual alveolar bone thickness at four reference levels, and the distance between the mandibular inferior border and alveolar crest were measured. Buccal and lingual alveolar bone thicknesses were assessed 3 mm and 4.5 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction, at mid-root, and at the root apex. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0, with p < .05 considered significant.Results: Significant differences were found among tooth groups for the main morphometric parameters (p < .001). Canines showed the greatest root length (15.69 ± 0.51 mm) and apical buccal alveolar bone thickness (3.96 ± 0.28 mm). At 3 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction, buccal alveolar bone thickness was below 1 mm in all groups (0.69–0.73 mm), whereas apical values ranged from 3.54 to 3.96 mm. Lingual alveolar bone was thicker at coronal levels and in most mid-root assessments, whereas buccal alveolar bone was thicker apically.Conclusion: These findings support individualized CBCT-based anatomical assessment before implant planning, periodontal evaluation, orthodontic treatment, and dentoalveolar surgery.
To evaluate alveolar bone thickness on the buccal and lingual surfaces of mandibular first and second molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to assess possible variations according to age and sex in a Peruvian population. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using 112 CBCT scans obtained fro...
Hada Luz Cerna Alonzo, Manuel Fernando Guillén Galarza, César Augusto Jiménez Prado et al.· Odovtos International Journa...· 0 citations
Objective: To perform a three-dimensional analysis of the available bone space and anatomical limits for mandibular molar distalization in a Chilean population using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and to compare bone values according to skeletal class, facial biotype and molar angulation.
Methods: A retrospectiv...
Montserrat Villanueva Iturriaga, Rocío Valenzuela Díaz, Gastón Salas Barrera et al.· Journal of Dental Health and...· 0 citations
Patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion may have limited alveolar support around the mandibular incisors, but conventional cephalometric measures do not directly describe the root-alveolus relationship. This retrospective cross-sectional study quantified labial and lingual alveolar bone thickness and examined whe...
T. Nguyen, Huong Ly Nguyen, Thi Dung Dao et al.· PLoS ONE· 0 citations
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate bilateral symmetry in root volume, length, mesiodistal (M/D) and buccopalatal (B/P) widths of maxillary permanent teeth anterior to the first molars.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This cross-sectional study analyzed CBCT data from 189 subjects (93 males and 96 females) with mean age 38.18 ± 8.08 years....
Cody Pewarchuk, H. Geha, Taraneh Maghsoodi-Zahedi et al.· Annals of Anatomy· 0 citations
Objectives: To study the soft and hard tissue anatomy in the maxillary anterior area and to
assess the relationship between sagittal root position (SRP) and periodontal phenotype and
between the thickness of the facial bone and the gingival thickness (GT).
Materials and Methods: Seventy-five subjects (450 teeth) were e...
N. Mustafa· Jordan Journal of Dentistry· 0 citations
Background/Objectives: Variation in the mandibular canal and surrounding bone may affect surgical risk during sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). This study examined whether canal position and bone morphology at SSRO-relevant sites differ according to mandibular sagittal position. Methods: This retrospective cone-be...
Mahzun Yıldız, Meyra Durmaz, Ömer Faruk Kocamaz et al.· Diagnostics· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.