Skip to content
Open access

Model 1b analytical performance specifications – report on the Prague 2025 workshop

Aug 2026 · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine · 0 citations · 54 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This report presents the expert presentations from the 2025 workshop, which exclusively focused on APS based on Model 1b, which effectively supported the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine’s database and its interactive tools for calculating APS.

Abstract

Abstract The main purpose of establishing APS is to ensure that test performance aligns with their specific clinical goals. Analytical performance specifications serve multiple functions: as acceptance criteria to verify that in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVD MD) meet regulatory and quality standards before market release; for external quality assurance assessments; for quality control, monitoring reagent lot-to-lot variability, and allowing preanalytical variation assessments in labs; and for guiding purchasing decisions by healthcare providers, reimbursement agencies, and both public and private insurers. Over the years, various systems and projects have been established to evaluate the current state of the art (Model 3) of IVD MD through external quality assurance (EQA). Different national and international EQA providers often use distinct acceptance criteria tailored to their organisational goals and local healthcare settings. Model 2, which relies on biological variation data, has been effectively supported by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine’s database and its interactive tools for calculating APS (www.biologicalvariation.eu). Nonetheless, debates continue about optimal APS setting methods and the most suitable models for different measurands and scenarios. To explore these issues further, workshops were held in Prague in 2023 and 2025. This report presents the expert presentations from the 2025 workshop, which exclusively focused on APS based on Model 1b.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Oct 2026

Target product profiles in laboratory medicine: a framework for defining test requirements and supporting outcome-based performance specifications

Abstract Despite rapid advances in diagnostics, many tests fail to deliver meaningful clinical or system value because their intended use, performance requirements, and implementation context were not clearly articulated early in development. Target product profiles (TPPs) offer a structured, consensus-based framework...

A. Smith, P. Cocco, K. Green et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Improving diagnostic safety – where should healthcare organizations start? CERC suggestions and our own

Although the CERC recommendations represent state-of-the-art, authoritative advice, it is believed there are 3 other interventions that have comparable financial and clinical impact profiles: 1 – Finding and learning from diagnostic errors; 2 – Improving clinical reasoning; and 3 – Promoting patient engagement.

Andrew P. J. Olson, C. Berdahl, T. Shimizu et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Analytical performance specifications in the clinical laboratory: Historical evolution, conceptual foundations and a practical decision framework.

Analytical performance specifications (APS) represent a crucial part of analytical quality. Laboratories use APS in the forms of total error (TE), imprecision, bias and measurement uncertainty (MU) to accurately assess the quality of the analytical phase. This narrative review summarizes the history and evolution of AP...

Sherif Mohamed Elsharkawi · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

The Incidence and Evaluation of Quality Indicators for Patient Safety Across the Total Testing Process in the Clinical Laboratory

The aim of this secondary research is to review the frequency of clinical laboratory errors and to determine the need to continually conduct critical research on the analytical stage even in the phase of automation and modern technologies.

Patricia Aboagye Boateng · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Open access Dec 2026

A RISK-BASED QUALITY ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK FOR FHIR-BASED CLINICAL APPLICATIONS: ALIGNING VERIFICATION EFFORT WITH CLINICAL CONSEQUENCE

Verification effort for FHIR-based clinical systems can be allocated by clinical consequence rather than by test-suite convention, extending quality obligations into the operational-behavior layer where specification-conformant systems have been shown to fail.

Pavlo Palamarchuk · 0 citations
Oct 2026

A-272 Benchmarking as a Tool for Performance Evaluation in Clinical Laboratory Quality Indicators

Although some results did not fully achieve the established internal targets, benchmarking analysis demonstrated performance comparable to that observed in peer laboratories, highlighting the importance of external evaluation for a more comprehensive interpretation of quality indicators.

S. Tufik, J. Banzato, Jennifer Alves et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.