This work benchmarked one fixed hand-crafted knowledge source, a pinned bank of Gabor targets injected only during training at $\sim$2\% overhead, against data-driven alternatives under one frozen recipe with fixed subsets.
Abstract
Fusing prior knowledge with data-driven learning is attractive where data is scarce, yet no controlled account says when it helps, is redundant, or harms. We benchmark one fixed hand-crafted knowledge source, a pinned bank of Gabor targets injected only during training at $\sim$2\% overhead, against data-driven alternatives (SimCLR, SimSiam, DINO, ImageNet transfer, augmentation, learned teachers) under one frozen recipe with fixed subsets: 13 datasets, 9 backbones, 150 to 1.28M images, 32--224\,px, 2.5M--86M parameters ($\computeCells$ classification configurations over $\computeRuns$ runs, plus segmentation and detection transplants). Across the training-time combinations we measure, three outcomes recur (decision-level fusion differs). Different-\emph{currency} sources can stack: the prior composes with DeiT augmentation on attention backbones and is worth $+26$ points to ViT-B/16 at $224$\,px, $+6.7$ at twice that budget. Same-currency sources substitute: against effective self-supervised pretraining, the combination never usefully exceeds the better single source. Fusing at full strength into an already-informed initialization interferes in proportion to what it carries: ImageNet transfer, $-15$ to $-17$ points, removed by a weaker auxiliary weight. Frozen-feature diagnostics measured on each source alone separate these outcomes retrospectively but do not predict them: a rule built on them calls one of nine unseen pairs. At a practitioner's own label budget, the frozen-feature gain predicts the end-to-end gain to within $0.17$ points across 30 cells and seven datasets; the underlying decomposition, $\Delta = G + \readout(\mathrm{base})$, holds in sign on $\auditRate\%$ of testable cells and is called an unseen backbone family's feature gain in advance. The project page is https://amughrabi.github.io/MomentAux.
This work frames the fusion of multiple imperfect ViT-based detectors as a consistency-based abduction problem solved at test time by an exact Integer Program (IP) and a polynomial-time heuristic and shows that this metacognitive layer can be learned without any domain knowledge by exploiting vector-space geometry.
Mario A. Leiva, Yue Ma, Qinru Qiu et al.· 0 citations
Experiments show that knowledge-aligned SFT can reduce factual hallucinations on WildHalu and Biography while largely preserving general capabilities and confirm that SFT targets beyond the base model's knowledge drive hallucination behavior.
AR Becker, Jakob Kemmler, David Thulke et al.· 0 citations
Many few-shot adaptation methods for vision-language models classify with a convex combination of the zero-shot text prototype and the mean of the K labelled image features, with a single blending ratio routinely tuned on held-out labels, often on the test set itself. We ask what the family's own bias-variance justification invites: what is the right ratio, can it be estimated without validation data, and is finding it where the performance is? First, the ratio minimising prototype mean-squared error has a closed form whose support-set plug-in is exactly a positive-part James-Stein coefficient shrinking towards the text prototype. Across 4,800 cells (ten datasets, five backbones including SigLIP, five shot counts, five seeds, four prompt tiers) this theoretically optimal ratio is a reliable estimate of the wrong quantity: on the 950 primary-tier cells where it is defined it trails a test-set-oracle ratio by 8.5 points. It saturates near 1, discarding the text prior for a nearest-class-mean classifier, because 78% of the text-image prototype distance it treats as bias is a class-independent offset that the arg max largely cancels. We prove the mechanism and bound its share of the damage at 26% by a counterfactual. Second, leave-one-out on the support set alone sets a ratio landing within 0.9 points of the oracle blend, so it is estimable without validation data. Third, validation-free linear probes beat even the oracle-tuned blend: CLAP by +1.9 points and LP++ by +1.5 on average, and at K>= 4 all four validation-free baselines sit above the oracle, the linear probes by margins excluding zero. These results locate the ceiling in the model class, not the hyperparameter: the ratio can be set near-optimally for free, and it is still not where the performance is. Code, cached features, per-cell records: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Liangzhi-Li/clipbench-blending
Liangzhi Li, Bowen Wang, Yiming Qian et al.· 0 citations
A front-layer trunk that pulls each language's projection toward the parallel-content centroid corroborates the diagnosis at training time, with consistent gains across three further benchmarks while preserving HRL performance.
Donghoon Han, Sunghyun Moon, Aidyn Zhakatayev et al.· 0 citations
This work studies raw pixels, SD-VAE latents and DINOv2 as well as MAE representation-autoencoder features within a unified masked autoregressive rectified-flow model and shows that compression, reconstruction fidelity, token dimensionality, and visible semantic clustering do not individually predict generative behavior.
Marcel Plocher, Bernhard Schölkopf, Andreas Geiger et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.