Skip to content
Conference

CRAYON: Supporting the Elicitation of Pluralistic Normative Requirements for Autonomous Systems

Aug 2026 · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference · pp. 25-36 · 1 citation · 42 references

Abstract

Normative requirements (NRs) capturing social, legal, ethical, empathetic, and cultural (SLEEC) expectations are increasingly critical for autonomous systems operating in humancentered environments. Governance frameworks such as the EU AI Act articulate these expectations as high-level principles, but translating them into concrete, capability-grounded requirements remains challenging in multidisciplinary settings. Existing work supports the analysis of normative rules once specified, yet offers limited methodological and tool support for the elicitation workflow itself. We introduce CRAYON, a tool-supported, humanin-the-loop methodology designed to support multidisciplinary stakeholders in eliciting normative requirements from high-level principles. CRAYON structures elicitation as an iterative process that links principles to system capabilities through proxies, rules, and concern-driven refinement, while maintaining explicit traceability. LLM-assisted recommenders generate candidate artifacts at each stage, and stakeholders retain responsibility for validation. We evaluate CRAYON with SLEEC experts on two real-world case studies and compare the resulting rule sets with a prior manual multidisciplinary elicitation. Results show that the CRAYON tool-supported workflow improves capabilitygrounded coverage and supports systematic refinement while preserving expert judgment and stakeholder creativity, nearly doubling the number of elicited rules (49 vs. 25) and achieving 86% stakeholder acceptance of generated candidates.

View source

Similar papers

Conference Aug 2026

CRAYON: Supporting the Elicitation of Pluralistic Normative Requirements for Autonomous Systems

Normative requirements capture social, legal, ethical, empathetic, and cultural (SLEEC) expectations that autonomous systems must satisfy when operating in human-centered environments. While regulatory frameworks such as the EU AI Act provide high-level principles, transforming these principles into concrete, system-sp...

L. Abodinar · 1 citation
Conference Aug 2026

Value-based Requirements Engineering for Human-Centred AI: Foundations, Challenges, and a Research Agenda

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly central to decisions that impact individuals and society, showing the need for these systems to align with stakeholder values. However, traditional engineering approaches often relegate values to implicit considerations or early design phases, which diminishes their...

Nour Dkhil, A. Bennaceur, Imen Benzarti · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Runtime configuration for situated governance of AI agents: a case study in investigative journalism

AI agents increasingly enter practitioner workflows through delegated, multi-step tasks, such as data analysis, document review, coding, and summarization. Existing governance debates tend to emphasize provider-level technical governance, which steers general model behavior, and policy, which defines the boundaries of...

Nick Hagar, Nick Diakopoulos · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

What Will Remain Human in Software Architecture? A Focus Group Report

AI development agents are increasingly used to support and partially automate software architecture tasks. To explore how practitioners perceive this shift, specifically what changes, what remains, and what new responsibilities emerge, we conducted a focus group at the 31st European Conference on Pattern Languages of P...

U. van Heesch, Olaf Zimmermann, Christian Kohls · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

A Vision for Compliance-Aware Requirements Engineering in the Age of the EU AI ACT

Validating AI system requirements against legal obligations is a growing challenge, particularly with the EU AI Act now in force and key compliance deadlines approaching from mid-2026. Current Requirements Engineering practice offers no systematic tooling: practitioner insights suggest that compliance validation remain...

T. Y. Emmy Lai · 1 citation
Review Open access Aug 2026

Enterprise Validation and Governance of Knowledge-Grounded and Agentic AI Systems: Challenges, Solutions, and a Trustworthiness Assurance Framework

It is concluded that validation and governance of grounded and agentic AI must be treated as a first-class enterprise reliability engineering discipline — auditable, thresholddriven, and embedded across the inference lifecycle — rather than as an extension of conventional model evaluation.

Suresh Babu Narra · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.