Skip to content

MILE: A Mechanically Isomorphic Hand Exoskeleton and Visuotactile Robotic Hand for Data Collection in Dexterous Manipulation

Nov 2025 · 6 citations · 37 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

MILE, a teleoperation-based data-collection system comprising the wearable MILE exoskeleton and the mechanically corresponding MILE-Tac robotic hand, and trained paired ACT and DP policies with and without tactile input on MILE-collected demonstrations for downstream imitation learning.

Abstract

Dexterous robotic hands perform complex, contact-rich manipulation. Imitation learning provides a route to such skills, but collecting human demonstrations with accurate hand actions and rich tactile information remains a key bottleneck. We present MILE, a teleoperation-based data-collection system comprising the wearable MILE exoskeleton and the mechanically corresponding MILE-Tac robotic hand. Because human-hand anatomy and wearability place tighter constraints on the high-DoF wearable, our human-first design begins with the MILE exoskeleton, equipped with custom modular joint encoders for accurate joint-angle acquisition. We then design the MILE-Tac robotic hand to share the exoskeleton's selected kinematic topology and joint-axis arrangement while satisfying robot-side implementation constraints, and equip its fingertips with compact visuotactile sensor modules. This correspondence enables direct exoskeleton-to-robot joint-space command transfer without online task-space inverse-kinematics retargeting. During teleoperation, the system synchronously records task-specific visual observations, four fingertip visuotactile streams, robot-hand proprioception, and exoskeleton-derived action commands. In a four-task teleoperation benchmark, MILE achieved a mean success rate of 76%, compared with 28% and 8% for glove-based and vision-based baselines, respectively. For downstream imitation learning, we trained paired ACT and DP policies with and without tactile input on MILE-collected demonstrations. The tactile-input variants achieved higher success rates in all paired evaluations.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.