Gravity Falls: A Comparative Analysis of Domain-Generation Algorithm (DGA) Detection Methods for Mobile Device Spearphishing
TL;DR
Both traditional heuristics and some common ML detection methods are ill-suited for consistently evolving DGA tactics observed in Gravity Falls, motivating more context-aware approaches and providing a reproducible benchmark for future evaluation.
Abstract
Mobile devices are frequent targets of eCrime threat actors through SMS spearphishing (smishing) links that leverage Domain Generation Algorithms (DGA) to rotate hostile infrastructure, avoid individual domain blocks, and bypass perimeter enterprise defenses. Despite this, DGA research and evaluation largely emphasize malware C2 and email phishing datasets, leaving limited evidence on how well detectors generalize to smishing-driven domain tactics outside enterprise perimeters. This work addresses that gap by evaluating traditional and machine-learning DGA detectors against Gravity Falls, a new dataset derived from smishing links delivered between 2022 and 2025. Gravity Falls captures a single threat actor's evolution across four technique clusters, shifting from short randomized strings to dictionary concatenation and themed combo-squatting variants used for credential theft and fee/fine fraud. Two string-analysis approaches (Shannon entropy and Exp0se) and two ML-based detectors (an LSTM classifier and COSSAS DGAD) are assessed using Top-1M domains as benign baselines. Results are strongly tactic-dependent: performance is highest on randomized-string domains but drops on dictionary concatenation and themed combo-squatting, with generally low recall across multiple tool/cluster pairings. Overall, both traditional heuristics and some common ML detection methods are ill-suited for consistently evolving DGA tactics observed in Gravity Falls, motivating more context-aware approaches and providing a reproducible benchmark for future evaluation.
