Skip to content
Conference

A Survey on Autonomous Compliance Enforcement using Agentic AI

Jul 2026 · 2026 4th International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Smart Systems (ICSCSS) · pp. 1814-1820 · 0 citations · 20 references

Abstract

Infrastructure compliance enforcement is increasingly considered for agentic AI systems that can plan, act and self-correct over many steps. A structured examination of the literature reveals several significant gaps. Multi-agent compliance pipelines have been architecturally proposed in several works but none report a functioning prototype with measurable compliance outcomes. Theoretical discussions extensively cover the safety hazards arising from the granting of autonomous control to an LLM agent over remediation of infrastructure. However, there are no documented real-world cases of an LLM agent outputting an operationally dangerous output in a compliance setting. The concept of utilising cross-run memory for compliance agents has been recognised but no lightweight implementation has yet been demonstrated to change the behaviour of agents. This paper surveys the field along seven dimensions: agentic architectures, compliance automation, LLM output safety, anomaly detection, multi-agent coordination, statefulness, and cloud-native deployment drawing on 46 representative works. Six specific gaps are identified through structured analysis. A hybrid architecture is then proposed that integrates the Isolation Forest anomaly detection with a four-agent LLM pipeline consisting of an Analyser that interprets system state and prior run history, a Planner that generates remediation strategies, a Verifier that applies LLM safety constraints, and an Explainer that produces human-readable audit reports. The architecture further incorporates deterministic value-level validation and persistent SQLite-based cross-run memory. In controlled experiments, the system improved compliance scores from 60% to 100%. Notably, a concrete instance of LLM overreach was observed during testing: the Planner agent generated a remediation plan that would have locked out SSH access by closing all network ports, a failure mode not previously reported in empirical literature. The paper concludes with a feature-by-feature comparison across twelve prominent works, a discussion of open challenges, and a proposed hybrid cloud extension.

View source

Similar papers

Review Jul 2026

Engineering Trustworthy Agentic AI for Critical Systems

Synthesizing across four constraint-bound engineering domains, agentic AI trustworthiness is shown to be a single problem, with a path outlined toward a reusable, cross-domain assurance framework analogous to the graded certification regimes used by mature safety-critical engineering fields.

Omar Al-Refai, Ibrahim Shahbaz, A. Husseinat et al. · 1 citation
#small language model Preprint Aug 2026

The Evaluation Context Protocol (ECP): A Portable Contract for AI Agent Evaluation

This paper proposes the Evaluation Context Protocol (ECP), an early-stage, vendor-neutral framework intended to act as a portable evaluation contract layer for agentic systems and describes an open-source reference implementation that includes adapters for LangChain, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, and PydanticAI.

Aniket Wattamwar, Manav Anandani, Mrunal Kakirwar · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Securing Agentic AI: From Per-Action Checks to Trajectory Assurance

Charting these challenges provides a roadmap toward trustworthy autonomous agent deployment: security must become a verifiable property of the architectures, protocols, and runtimes that govern agent behavior, rather than an optional layer of guidance.

Alireza Lotfi, Subangkar Karmaker Shanto, Imtiaz Karim et al. · 1 citation
Review Aug 2026

Agent Safety Should Be a Runtime Contract

The right unit of safety in agentic AI is the trajectory-with-checkable-evidence, not the model, and this work formalizes an Agent Trajectory Schema and Evidence Chain, state a compositional gating proposition based on standard monitor composition, and outline a research agenda.

Albus W. Ng, Yibin Han, Jusheng Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Multi-Agent AI Safety as an Institutional Design Problem

This is the first paper from POLIS, an ongoing research programme studying algorithmic institutions for multi-agent systems, and asks which parts of an AI institution produce safety and how they do it.

X. Abdullah · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

CyberLLM: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Autonomous Detection and Guarded Response in Automotive Cybersecurity

CyberLLM is presented, a multi-agent, LLM-orchestrated framework that autonomously detects vulnerabilities and executes remediations under a formal, runtime safety guard, and indicates that LLM agents can perform useful autonomous cyber-defense when wrapped in a deterministic, auditable safety envelope.

Nenad Petrovic, Oussama Jeddou, Feres Ben Fraj et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.