Seeing Parts, Reasoning about Worlds: Visual Inference under Partial Observation

Abstract

World modeling under partial observation requires reasoning about the complete worlds that remain compatible with limited visual evidence. Occluded objects and unseen regions can leave several world states possible; additional views can exclude alternatives and strengthen the conclusions supported by the observations. We introduce WorldScope to study this process through possible-world semantics, evidence-grounded data, and learned visual representations. WorldScope-1.2M provides 1.2 million English question-answer pairs spanning eight world properties, ten task interfaces, and three observation protocols. Its answers encode confirmed facts, supported bounds, and unresolved possibilities. Complementary supervision comprises 4,800 certified counterworld groups with equivalent base observations and different hidden object configurations and query answers. These groups provide physical witnesses of ambiguity and training-only labels for world compatibility and view-induced exclusions. We propose WorldFlow, which composes cross-view entity evidence and support-surface coverage into an image-subset evidence lattice. Counterworld compatibility and transition objectives train subset representations to reflect how new observations constrain possible worlds. A shared answer generator uses these representations to predict the strongest supported conclusion. WorldScope-Bench evaluates claim judgments and evidence-dependent conclusions as views are selected, combined, removed, or ordered. On its 5,000-question test set, WorldFlow reaches 64.34% exact accuracy, improving over the same backbone trained on QA alone by 24.88 percentage points. It retains 50.43% accuracy on the 3,000 questions from structure-disjoint scenes.