Skip to content

Unsupervised spiking feature learning for event-based pedestrian crossing detection: approaching supervised accuracy without labelled training data

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 53 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The findings indicate that the accuracy cost of removing labels from feature learning is small on this benchmark, and that reported weaknesses of unsupervised spiking networks may be attributable to the readout protocol rather than to the learning rule.

Abstract

Event cameras are well suited to pedestrian crossing detection, and spiking neural networks (SNNs) can process their output natively, but current SNN detectors are trained with supervised backpropagation and therefore require costly frame-level crossing labels. We investigate crossing detection with no labels in feature learning and report the first unsupervised results on the recent DVS-PedX pedestrian-crossing benchmark. A single spiking layer trained with winner-take-all spike-timing-dependent plasticity learns a dictionary from unlabelled event-frame patches; frames are encoded by cosine similarity to the learned filters with spatial pooling and read out by a linear classifier, the only supervised component. On the 24,454-frame test split the method attains 90.3% accuracy and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.936, compared with 92.0% and 0.943 for a supervised spiking network trained end-to-end on the same frames; under adverse weather the AUROC is 0.913. The result is insensitive to the choice of plasticity rule but depends strongly on the readout protocol: with the classical neuron-assignment readout the same network attains only 0.70 AUROC. On the benchmark's real converted portion, a readout refit lifts performance from chance (0.53) to 0.67 AUROC, within the published supervised range. These findings indicate that the accuracy cost of removing labels from feature learning is small on this benchmark, and that reported weaknesses of unsupervised spiking networks may be attributable to the readout protocol rather than to the learning rule.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.