Sep 2026· Computational Materials Science· Vol 275, pp. 115108
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Abstract
Melting temperature is a critical property for high-temperature materials design, but first-principles melting calculations based on finite-temperature molecular dynamics can require substantial computational resources. The SLUSCHI method reduces this cost by using small-cell solid–liquid coexistence simulations and statistical analysis of many short molecular-dynamics trajectories. Here I present SLUSCHI-UP , a deployed web service for atomistic melting-temperature estimation that couples the SLUSCHI workflow to selectable pretrained universal machine-learning interatomic potentials (uMLIPs) and asynchronous GPU execution. Users submit a crystal structure through a Materials Project identifier or POSCAR input, select a uMLIP backend, and launch a queued melting calculation without local installation of simulation software. The current production interface supports mace-mpa-0-medium , Allegro-OAM-L , and DPA-3.2-5M-OMat24 , while beta deployments expose additional models. On the compact MeltBench-10 validation set, the three production backends produce raw coexistence mean absolute errors in the range of 174–283 K, with PBE correction improved to 155 K. Across the broader set of materials tested so far in MeltBench, the current deployed-job snapshot contains 206 raw uMLIP entries, and PBE-corrected Allegro-OAM-L predictions reach a mean absolute error of approximately 197 K. These values should be interpreted as screening-level infrastructure validation rather than a definitive ranking of uMLIPs. The results demonstrate that SLUSCHI-UP provides a practical, provenance-aware deployment layer between fast scalar melting-temperature predictors and much more expensive first-principles coexistence calculations, while retaining the usual limitations of uMLIP transferability, finite-size sampling, and high-temperature trajectory stability.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The results show that the embedded industry has been able to apply agile methods in its development processes and that the appreciation of the agile methods and their individual practices appears to increase once adopted and applied in practice.
O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· IET Software· 238 citations· ⚡9
Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 236 citations· ⚡13
The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.
P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al.· Conference on Object-Oriente...· 225 citations· ⚡18
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 6, 2026
Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.
Requirements in large systems rarely exist in isolation. Their meaning depends on the wider project context - other requirements, policies, decisions, tests, and implementation details. That becomes especially important when AI is used for review, because spotting a possible conflict or gap is only the beginning. ReqSpace explores how AI, visualisation, and connected project context can help reviewers understand those findings, trace the relationships behind them, and focus on the questions that…
AI is making software generation faster, but speed does not remove the need for expertise. As more work is delegated to AI, tacit knowledge may become one of the most important human advantages in software engineering. The post Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering appeared first on GPT-Lab.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.