Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for fMRI Functional Connectivity via Simulation-Based Inference

Abstract

Optimizing fMRI scan duration and spatial resolution is critical for experimental design, yet traditional correlation-based approaches cannot quantify uncertainty or disentangle scanner measurement noise from true neural variability across subjects. Without principled uncertainty bounds, researchers cannot know whether a protocol is long enough to reliably estimate connectivity, or whether between-subject differences reflect biological variation or noise. We present a Bayesian framework modeling BOLD dynamics as coupled Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes, using Sequential Neural Posterior Estimation to obtain connectivity posteriors while accounting for frequency-independent measurement noise across the BOLD spectrum. Applied to N = 28 healthy controls (55 scans) at 7T using a functional network atlas (65 DMN regions), the framework quantifies uncertainty across its sources: scanner noise, subject variability, and acquisition length. Spatial analysis identifies a mean of 46 voxels per ROI, roughly half of typical region sizes, as sufficient to achieve 90% of asymptotic precision. At the single-subject level, 7T reaches its within-session precision plateau in approximately 7 minutes versus 10 minutes for 3T, a 40% reduction in required scan time, providing the first direct, model-based quantification of the scan-time advantage conferred by higher field strength. At the population level, 3T requires roughly 37 times more per-subject scan time than 7T for the pooled curves to converge, confirming a consistent advantage of higher field strength at every timescale. Together these findings provide concrete, scanner-specific guidance for protocol optimization, with direct implications for reducing acquisition costs and improving the reliability of connectivity-based clinical biomarkers. We provide code enabling researchers to derive these bounds from their own data.