An end-to-end pipeline for automatically generating client networks from therapy transcripts to support case conceptualization and treatment planning and more research is needed to examine whether these networks improve treatment outcomes, including relative to other methods of treatment personalization, such as statistically estimated networks.
Abstract
Recent advances in psychotherapy have focused on treatment personalization, such as by selecting treatment modules based on individual networks. However, estimating personalized networks typically requires intensive longitudinal data, which is not always feasible to collect. A solution to increase scalability of network-driven treatment personalization is leveraging large language models (LLMs). In this study, we developed an end-to-end pipeline for automatically generating client networks to support case conceptualization and treatment planning. We annotated 8,028 utterances from 77 therapy transcripts (N = 6). In the first stage of the pipeline, we identified clinically relevant processes (binary classification) and their corresponding dimensions (multi-label classification). Then, we introduced a two-step method that grouped the processes into clinically meaningful clusters and generated labels for the clusters. Finally, we generated connections between clusters. Evaluation results generally supported model utility, however, interrater agreement on model performance metrics was inconsistent, ranging from poor to substantial. Qualitative examination of the networks indicated consistency with original study data. Given coherence and interpretability of the generated networks, developing networks from therapy transcripts using LLMs appears to be feasible. Nonetheless, more research is needed to examine whether these networks improve treatment outcomes, including relative to other methods of treatment personalization, such as statistically estimated networks. Potential use cases and limitations of our pipeline are discussed.
740
Background:
While large language models (LLMs) have been effective at medical domain question and answer, their effectiveness and sufficiency in determining the medical necessity (MN) of complex therapeutics in oncology for a given patient’s clinical context is unclear. Recent advances in artificial intelli...
B. Chaudhry, Andrew T. Yue, Lisa Tran· JCO Oncology Practice· 0 citations
By tracing the evolutionary trajectories of these methodologies, this scoping review provides a mechanism-centered framework to inform responsible model development and deployment in medical settings, tailored to task complexity, data characteristics, and resource constraints.
Fang Li, Jian-Fu Li, Weiguo Cao et al.· npj Health Systems· 0 citations
Substance Use Disorder (SUD) counseling requires patient responses that reflect underlying cognitive states such as beliefs, coping strategies, and readiness for change. Although large language models (LLMs) can generate fluent text, they often fail to produce cognitively coherent and clinically realistic patient behav...
Thushara Manjari Naduvilakandy, Hyeju Jang, M. Al Hasan· 0 citations
Research on large language model (LLM)-based automated assessment (AA) has expanded rapidly. Nevertheless, the literature remains fragmented across contributions, models, implementation configurations, datasets, and evaluation metrics, complicating efforts to identify approaches suitable for personalized learning. This...
H. D. Septama, A. Permanasari, R. Ferdiana· IEEE Access· 0 citations