Aug 2026· Biomaterials· Vol 337, pp.
124551
· 0 citations· 165 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This review traces the evolution of nanomedicine from a passive drug delivery vehicle to a therapeutic program encoded in a physical structure, and examines the design constraints that will determine whether the next generation of cancer nanomedicines fulfills its clinical promise.
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy has reshaped oncology, yet its broad application is constrained by an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and the systemic toxicities of conventional treatments. This review traces the evolution of nanomedicine from a passive drug delivery vehicle to a therapeutic program encoded in a physical structure. The tumor microenvironment poses physical and cellular barriers that operate not as independent hurdles but as self-reinforcing systems, an architecture that dictates a target-selection logic whereby nanocarriers must engage paired targets simultaneously rather than sequentially. This logic translates into three coupled engineering requirements, namely co-loading of physicochemically diverse agents, spatial coordination across subcellular compartments, and temporal synchronization of release. Pre-programmed stimuli-responsive systems embody the current capability for meeting these demands. The boundary between pre-programmed computation and adaptive feedback is further evaluated, with the latter defined by the capacity to sense therapeutic outcomes and modulate subsequent release, a feat that remains unrealized in vivo. Finally, three translational challenges are assessed, all converging on whether the execution of a nanocarrier's therapeutic program can be trusted in the patient. Trust becomes possible when the carrier's trajectory hinges on biological processes conserved across patients, when its fabrication preserves the structural features encoding its function, and when its material composition dictates a predictable clearance pathway. These are not translational afterthoughts but the design constraints that will determine whether the next generation of cancer nanomedicines fulfills its clinical promise.
Abstract Effective drug delivery to the central nervous system remains a persistent challenge owing to the blood–brain barrier (BBB), heterogeneous pathological microenvironments, and the limited capacity of conventional carriers to achieve precise spatiotemporal control over drug release. Multifunctional hybrid nanome...
Yu-Qin Wu, Mu-Kun Wang, Tian-Peng Li et al.· International Journal of Nan...· 0 citations
A quantitative framework based on five key performance dimensions: dynamic range, temporal kinetics, output efficiency, spatial fidelity, and cycle retention is proposed, which discusses the emerging roles for computational modeling and artificial intelligence in enabling multiobjective optimization of these metrics an...
Pengwen Chen, Abdulaziz Alhussan, P. Cullis et al.· ACS Nano Medicine· 0 citations
Immunotherapy has transformed oncology, but immune-related adverse effects and suboptimal tumor accumulation often hamper conventional systemic delivery. Local delivery systems that integrate microneedles (MNs) with nanocarriers responsive to tumor microenvironments (TMEs) triggered by acidic, hypoxic, or enzyme-specif...
Komang Dian Aditya Putra, A. P. Gani, Akhmad Kharis Nugroho· Fabad journal of pharmaceuti...· 0 citations
Combination therapy tactics that incorporate numerous therapies via innovative multi-drug co-loaded nanomedicine delivery systems have shown considerable benefits in crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and slowing glioma growth. However, efficiently developing multi-drug co-loaded delivery systems with high drug loa...
The cancer is still one of the world’s biggest public health problems due to its diversity (tumor), multiresistance, and non-specific delivery by drugs like chemotherapy. Oncological precision medicine is changing treatment paradigms towards targeted therapies with high specificity and low-toxicity options for patients...
C. J. Jiflin, Mohana Sundaram Somasundharam Pushpanathan, Jeevitha Dhayalan et al.· BOHR Journal of Pharmaceutic...· 0 citations
This review examines the main classes of nanoplatforms currently explored for cancer therapy, including inorganic, polymeric, lipid-based, and hybrid organic–inorganic systems, and considers emerging directions in AI-guided nanoparticle engineerization design and natural-compound-based nanomedicines, both of which are...
C. Boncristiani, F. Baldassarre, Khadija Eddahaoui et al.· Materials· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.