Sep 2026· Anatolian journal of cardiology· 0 citations
Medicine
TL;DR
Weight-adjusted waist index was the strongest independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among 4 adiposity indices, and its linear dose-response relationship, consistency across subgroups, and calculability from waist circumference and body weight alone support its use as a practical alternative to BMI for mortality risk stratification.
Abstract
Background
Body mass index (BMI), the most widely used adiposity metric, cannot differentiate fat distribution from lean mass, limiting its prognostic utility. This study compared the weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) with BMI, waist-to-height ratio, and relative fat mass (RFM) as predictors of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality using a z-standard-ized framework.
Methods
Data from 18 496 adults aged ≥20 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2018 were linked to the National Death Index through December 31, 2019. Four adiposity indices were z-standardized and analyzed using survey-weighted Cox models with sequential adjustment. Dose-response relationships were assessed using restricted cubic splines, and subgroup analyses examined the effect modification by sex, multimorbidity, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
Results
Over a median follow-up of 4.83 years, 976 all-cause and 291 cardiovascular deaths occurred. Weight-adjusted waist index demonstrated the strongest association with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.34; 95% CI 1.23-1.46; P < .001); BMI and RFM did not reach significance. After mutual adjustment, WWI retained its association (HR 1.40; P < .001) while BMI did not reach statistical significance in the adjusted model. Weight-adjusted waist index showed a linear dose-response relationship, contrasting the J-shaped curve of BMI. The association was consistent across subgroups but attenuated in participants with eGFR < 60 (interaction P = .034).
Conclusion
Weight-adjusted waist index was the strongest independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among 4 adiposity indices. Its linear dose-response relationship, consistency across subgroups, and calculability from waist circumference and body weight alone support its use as a practical alternative to BMI for mortality risk stratification.
BACKGROUND
In the US population, the association and predictive performance of obesity indices -- Body Mass Index (BMI), Body Shape Index (ABSI), Body Roundness Index (BRI), Waist Circumference (WC), and Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR) with mortality outcomes Cardiovascular Mortality (CVM) and All-Cause Mortality (ACM)) i...
De-Xiang Xia, Rui Li, Chang Shu et al.· Current Medicinal Chemistry· 0 citations
Assessing both central adiposity and inflammatory burden may aid in identifying high-risk CKD patients and guide clinical strategies for improving long-term outcomes.
Abstract Central adiposity is a key driver of cardiovascular risk in chronic kidney disease (CKD), yet conventional obesity indices incompletely capture this risk. The weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) is an emerging anthropometric measure that integrates abdominal adiposity independent of body weight, but its prognost...
This study explores the relationship between the weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) and bone mineral density (BMD) in American men aged 18-59 years old and evaluates whether WWI can serve as a simple screening indicator for obesity-related bone loss. A total of 5,726 men from four cycles of the National Health and Nutri...
Yu-Fei Long, Li-Yong Qin, Hao Long et al.· American Journal of Men's He...· 0 citations
Obesity is a major risk factor for cardiometabolic disease, but which indicator best identifies elevated risk remains uncertain. This cross-sectional study compared the associations and discriminatory ability of body mass index (BMI), percent body fat (PBF), waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) fo...
Eunok Park· Biological Research for Nurs...· 0 citations