This paper argues that genuine enterprise productivity gains require proactive agents: systems that surface relevant, actionable information to workers before they ask, and proposes the Context Graph, a live relational data structure that models enterprise entities, their relationships, and state transitions over time.
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and agentic frameworks have advanced enterprise AI considerably, yet agents remain fundamentally reactive: they wait for a human query before acting. This paper argues that genuine enterprise productivity gains require proactive agents: systems that surface relevant, actionable information to workers before they ask. We propose the Context Graph, a live relational data structure that models enterprise entities, their relationships, and state transitions over time. Built on this graph, we define a Delta Detection Engine that continuously monitors state changes, a Proactivity Scorer that ranks candidate insights by urgency, relevance, and persona-fit, and a Surfacing Layer powered by an LLM that delivers ranked notifications with grounded explanations. We formalize each component, derive a unified Proactivity Score function, and provide a complete end-to-end Python implementation using NetworkX and the Anthropic Claude API. Evaluation across three generic enterprise case studies (contract lifecycle management, engineering incident response, and sales pipeline hygiene) demonstrates that context-graph-driven proactivity achieves Precision@5 of 0.83, a false positive rate of 0.11, and reduces mean time to surface from 47 minutes (reactive baseline) to under 30 second.
A design-oriented framework, an evaluation protocol, and a set of open problems for governed structured-data agents are proposed for retrieval semantics, authorization, intent recognition, entity resolution, evaluation, failure modes, and latency.
TGMS is a bi-temporal property graph management system that exposes thirteen verified temporal operators as agent tools that can answer belief-state questions such as ``as of transaction time $T$, what did the system believe?''
It is argued that the key challenges are bridging the gap between personal and organizational memory, building effective agentic retrieval beyond naive RAG, and enabling organizations to evaluate their agents against their own data through self-serving evals.
Till Döhmen, MotherDuckNetherlands, Jacob Matson et al.· 0 citations
The database community has repeatedly advanced the state of the art by recognizing that new workloads demand new system architectures. We argue that long-horizon agentic tasks -- code generation, scientific discovery, hardware design -- are such a workload. These agents explore: they generate artifacts, execute tools,...
Gang Liao, Yujia He, Abdullah Ozturk et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
MAP-Graph is introduced, a provenance-aware memory layer that represents agents, sources, memories, claims, and actions in a typed execution graph and supports provenance as an operational control signal, rather than only post-hoc audit metadata, within the evaluated setting.
In today's fast-paced environment, the ability to swiftly access, understand, and act on data is no longer optional; it is essential. Yet most organizations remain data-rich but insight-poor, constrained by the complexity of querying, interpreting, and explaining enterprise-scale information. We present Polaris, a supe...
K. VaruniH., Soham Sarkar, J. Kumar et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.