Artificial intelligence should currently be considered primarily as a decision -support technology that complements rather than replaces ophthalmologists for its safe and effective implementation.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence has rapidly become an important technological component of modern ophthalmology, particularly in the analysis of ophthalmic images and the automated detection of ocular pathology. The increasing availability of digital fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, optical coherence tomography angiography, and other imaging modalities has created large datasets suitable for machine learning and deep learning applications. AI-based systems are currently being investigated and imple mented for screening, diagnosis, classification, prognosis, and longitudinal monitoring of multiple ophthalmic diseases. The most established applications involve diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and retinopathy of prematurity. Deep learning algorithms can identify characteristic retinal lesions, assess optic nerve head changes, quantify retinal fluid, and detect structural abnormalities with performance approaching that of experienced ophthalmic graders in selected clinical tasks. Despite these advances, several limitations remain, including dataset bias, variability between imaging devices, insufficient external validation, limited interpretability, regulatory challenges, and uncertainty regarding clinical responsibility for AI- generated decisions. [10,11] Therefore, AI should currently be considered primarily as a decision -support technology that complements rather than replaces ophthalmologists. Proper integration of AI into clinical workflows, continuous validation, transparency, and appropriate human oversight will be essential for its safe and effective implementation.
Clinically useful OCT‐based AI should be implemented as clinician‐led decision support, with explicit intended use, external validation, calibration, post‐deployment monitoring, and lifecycle governance.
Stjepan Škudar· Eye & ENT Research· 0 citations
This review summarises the machine learning and AI approaches for disease detection in ophthalmology and discusses emerging paradigms and highlights key challenges impacting clinical translation.
Maria Jessica Cruz, Siddharth Limaye, Mark Christopher· Ophthalmic & physiological o...· 1 citation
This narrative review summarizes the methodological evolution of ophthalmic AI, including traditional machine learning, task‐specific deep learning, self‐supervised learning, foundation models, multimodal AI, and generative AI, and examines their applications across major ophthalmic diseases.
Yu-Xi Liu, Han-Ruo Liu· Eye & ENT Research· 0 citations
Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness worldwide, and early detection is essential to prevent permanent loss of vision. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled automated analysis of ophthalmic imaging modalities such as retinal fundus photography and optical coherence tomog...
D. S, Neetha K. Nataraj, Raghi R. Menon et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
AI tools under various names, such as IDx-DR, EyeArt, and Google's AI algorithm, are quick and price-effective tests using an AI solution for early diagnosis of DR in either developed or developing economies.
Harshita, Saumya Das, Priyanka Bansal· Current Drug Discovery Techn...· 0 citations
While AI supports objective, scalable, and reproducible analyses of ophthalmic imaging data, limitations in resolution, generalizability, and specificity prevent its use as an independent substitute for tissue-based diagnosis where histopathologic confirmation is required.
Jimena Tatiana Hathaway, Anna M. Stagner· Acta Pathologica, Microbiolo...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.