Outcomes of On- Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Acute and Subacute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study
Aug 2026· Journal of Clinical Medicine· Vol 15, pp. 6707· 0 citations· 25 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Off-pump CABG was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality and MACCEs in patients with acute and subacute myocardial infarction, and the association with recurrent myocardial infarction was less consistent across analytical approaches and should be interpreted cautiously.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The comparative efficacy of off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with acute and subacute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains controversial. We compared the outcomes of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in Korean patients with acute and subacute myocardial infarction. Methods: This nationwide retrospective cohort study included 14,578 propensity score-matched patients undergoing on-pump or off-pump CABG between 2007 and 2022 using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. The primary outcomes were recurrent myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, stroke, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Chi-square, Kaplan–Meier, and log-rank tests and Cox regression analysis were used. Results: Compared with on-pump CABG, off-pump CABG was associated with significantly lower risks of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), all-cause mortality, and recurrent myocardial infarction in the cause-specific Cox analysis, whereas repeat revascularization and stroke rates were comparable between groups. However, the association with recurrent myocardial infarction was not statistically significant in the Fine–Gray competing-risk analysis. Conclusions: Off-pump CABG was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality and MACCEs in patients with acute and subacute myocardial infarction. The association with recurrent myocardial infarction was less consistent across analytical approaches and should be interpreted cautiously.
INTRODUCTION
Most studies comparing Off-pump and On-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have primarily focused on short-term outcomes. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate and compare long-term complications and survival between these surgical approaches.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This retrospective stu...
Kristjana Lind Olafsdottir, Luis Gisli Rabelo, Boðvar Pall Asgeirsson et al.· Icelandic Medical Journal· 0 citations
Background: The comparative effectiveness of off-pump (OPCAB) and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCAB) in severe left ventricular dysfunction remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a retrospective institutional cohort study of isolated CABG procedures performed from 1996 to 2023. Registry-coded severe dysf...
Man-Yiu Lau, Maria Comanici, N. Marczin et al.· British Journal of Healthcar...· 0 citations
Background: Patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) represent a high-risk subgroup for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The primary goal of CABG is durable myocardial revascularization to prevent recurrent ischemic events and improve survival. Minimally invasive CABG (MICS-CABG) may accelerate recovery, b...
Y. Lei, Guang Li, Zhao Yang et al.· Reviews in cardiovascular me...· 0 citations
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the standard reperfusion strategy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, contemporary real-world outcomes of de novo PCI in older adults with a history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are not well described. We compared in-hospital outc...
F. Anamika, Sakshi Dixit, K. Ramphul et al.· Archives of Medical Science...· 0 citations
Higher SYNTAX scores were associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, reflecting the impact of coronary lesion complexity on short-term prognosis, but the findings should be interpreted with caution due to the single center design, limited follow-up duration, and potential residual confounding...
Sarika Goud Bommena, A. Dihitha, P. Rachana et al.· International Journal of App...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.