SURE-Pipe provides a robust and multipurpose framework for comparative genomics, and the outcomes can be used for species identification and the development of genome-based diagnostic approaches.
Abstract
Abstract Identification of unique and shared genomic regions between organisms has substantial translational potential for the development of marker-based diagnostic assays and sequence homology-driven taxonomic classification. An automated pipeline capable of performing genome comparisons at both the intra- and inter-species levels with minimal computational requirements can significantly advance genome-driven translational research. Species-specific genomic regions are particularly valuable for sequence-based species identification and for developing DNA amplification- or hybridization-based diagnostic assays. Here, we present SURE-Pipe, an automated and flexible pipeline for genome comparison and extraction of unique and shared genomic regions (https://github.com/BPaul-bioinfoLAB/SURE-Pipe). Benchmarking of this pipeline using simulated datasets demonstrated high accuracy for shared and unique region identification. Using the pairwise genome comparison module, six genome pairs from diverse microorganisms were analysed, and identified the unique and shared regions. In addition, the multigenome comparison module was applied to 96 genomes representing 24 Bacillus species and identified species-specific genomic regions. These regions were highly conserved among four strains of a species (>98% sequence identity) and exhibit little to no similarity with other species. Species-specific primers designed for all 24 Bacillus species showed no off-target amplification in in-silico polymerase chain reaction analysis, indicating their specificity. Overall, SURE-Pipe provides a robust and multipurpose framework for comparative genomics, and the outcomes can be used for species identification and the development of genome-based diagnostic approaches.
The rapid growth in publicly available genome assemblies has made selecting genomes suitable for downstream analyses increasingly challenging. Differences in assembly and annotation quality can influence gene completeness, duplication rates, contiguity, repeat representation, and other characteristics. Assessing genome...
Christopher D. R. Wyatt, Fernando Duarte Frutos, Stephen D. Turner et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
The GenomeCompendium is released, a public database and interactive analysis tool for complete prokaryotic genomes and it is shown that complex, repeat-rich genomes are more common than previously estimated.
Tiberiu Totu, Garance Jaques, B. Heiniger et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
A semi‐automated pipeline is developed and four genomic annotation methods (BRAKER2, BUSCO, Miniprot and Scipio) are compared to suggest that combining these tools can yield more accurate results in genomic research.
Gwenaëlle Vigo, Benjamin Penaud, Eliette L. Reboud et al.· Molecular Ecology Resources· 0 citations
This study presents the first large-scale investigation of four prominent open-source annotation tools (Prokka, Bakta, EggNOG-mapper, and PGAP) across 156,033 diverse genomes, highlighting tool-specific strengths crucial for selecting optimal solutions based on genome quality, taxonomy, and origin.
Mateusz Jundzill, Martin Hölzer, S. Mangul et al.· Genome Biology· 0 citations
Pangenome analysis reveals recurrent gene-content variation beyond a single reference genome, but its application to eukaryotes is constrained by inconsistent gene annotation. ANNEVO predicts gene models from genome FASTA assemblies without RNA-seq data. We developed EukPan, an automated post-annotation pipeline that s...
K. Seki, Masatoshi Goto, Taiki Futagami et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Abstract Summary Gene annotation of metagenome-assembled genomes is a critical step in determining the functional potential of microbial communities from environmental samples. However, annotation workflows using tools such as Prokka or Bakta produce per-bin output with 10 to 14 files per bin, making manual review infe...
Kepler Ridge, Byron J. Adams· Bioinformatics Advances· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.