Aug 2026· Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems· pp. 561-566· 0 citations· 24 references
TL;DR
It is asked whether small open-weight language models, fine-tuned and run entirely on local hardware, can do gender pay gaps reporting work without the data leaving the organisation without dedicated machine-learning infrastructure.
Abstract
The EU Pay Transparency Directive (2023/970), applicable from June 2026, requires large employers to report gender pay gaps with documentation of how they were calculated. Turning raw statistical outputs into compliant, readable reports is a barrier for human-resources teams without data-science expertise. Cloud language models could help, but pay data is special-category personal data under the GDPR and risky to send to external services. We therefore ask whether small open-weight language models, fine-tuned and run entirely on local hardware, can do this work without the data leaving the organisation. Using a memory-efficient method (QLoRA, quantized low-rank adaptation), we adapt Llama 3.1 8B, Mistral 7B and Phi-3.5 Mini for three tasks: turning an analyst’s question into statistical parameters, explaining pay-gap results faithfully, and checking a report against the Directive. All run on a mid-range workstation with an 8 GB GPU. Fine-tuning clearly helps the first and third tasks, whereas faithful explanation depends more on retrieving worked examples at inference time. Accuracy saturates at about 40 training examples in total (around 13 per task), indicating feasibility without dedicated machine-learning infrastructure.
A blockchain-based commit-reveal protocol using Autonomous Economic Agents on an Ethereum-compatible ledger creates a tamper-evident audit trail that separates blind evaluation from post-hoc claims and reduces the verification burden on independent researchers and leaderboard operators.
The results argue for multi-metric, multi-family auditing over any single aggregate score, and for LLM-agent-generated audits as a practical, low-cost complement to human-curated audits for any candidate-job matching pipeline.
Sai Yashwant, S. Bansal, Anurag Dubey et al.· 0 citations
Large language models are increasingly being deployed in governmental settings, yet few existing evaluation frameworks jointly reflect the values of public administration and the linguistic requirements of non-English contexts. We present the"Grip on LLMs"framework, a systematic evaluation suite for Dutch governmental...
Laurens Samson, Iva Gornishka, Gossa Lô et al.· 0 citations
This work examines whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can serve as explanation layers that translate post-hoc explanation artefacts into stakeholder-appropriate risk narratives and discusses implications for the governance of risk models, including deployment considerations and the value of domain-aligned LLMs in reg...
Sahab Zandi, Noah Kostesku, Christophe Mues et al.· 0 citations
FinRiskAtlas is introduced, a Chinese-language benchmark that evaluates financial LLMs along two complementary dimensions: operation execution under fixed evidence states and evidence-state control under evolving review conditions, and shows that broad financial capability scores do not fully capture where models are r...
Su-Yang Zhong, Jingzhe Zhu, Qi Xu et al.· 1 citation
An LLM asked for a trading strategy returns three artifacts at once: a natural-language rationale, an executable implementation, and once run, a track record. Whether these are the same object is rarely checked. We present FIDES, a measurement protocol that treats them as three views to be reconciled rather than one de...
Arther Tian, Alex Ding, Simon Wu et al.· 0 citations